(Reprinted with permission: https://www.dailyjournal.com/) By M. Jonathan Hayes, Resnik Hayes, Moradi LLP (Los Angeles) I met with my best friend Jim King, consumer bankruptcy attorney extraordinaire, during the Thanksgiving break in 2014, several weeks before his untimely death. We met at his office in Glendale to do his oral history. Somewhere in there I told him he could borrow my...
Critical Case Comment
Print This Article
Link to Post:
By Kevin R. Anderson, Chapter 13 Trustee for the District of Utah (Salt Lake City)
US v. Hale. (In re Hale), No. 13-4099 (10th Cir. Aug. 12, 2014) 2014 WL 3906862.
First, it is never a good idea to send your bankruptcy trustee a letter alleging a “Hazmat” threat. Second, a criminal conviction for perjury arising from testimony at a 341 Meeting requires: (1) near absolute clarity from the questioner; and (2) evidence as to how the debtor understood the question . . .
It looks like you are not signed in or registered! This content is only available to members.
Or sign in below:
Related Articles
Unmet Installments Means Dismissal for Pro Se
Critical Case Comment – The Plan Rules
Recent Cases Navigate Retirement Account Exemptions
In Remembrance of Judge Theodor C. Albert
NEW SCAM ALERT . . . this one is going to attorneys
Congress, It’s Time to Get Rid of That Stupid Means Test
From Jen Lee
The Brunner Student Loan Hardship Test: Alive and Well in The Big Apple
Declining Cases and Increasing Judicial Vacancies
SCOTUS Cases Every Bankruptcy Lawyer Should Know – Part 8 of 8