On February 22, the Supreme Court issued its opinion in Bartenwerfer v. Buckley, 598 U.S. _____, 2023 WL 2023 WL 2144417 (Feb. 22, 2023), affirming the Ninth Circuit’s decision and resolving “confusion in the lower courts on the meaning of § 523(a)(2)(A).”1 Two Justices joined the opinion with the understanding that the Court was only addressing fraud in the context...
Critical Case Comment
Print This Article
Link to Post:
By Henry E. Hildebrand, III, Chapter 13 Trustee, Nashville, TN
In re Howard, 507 B.R. 394 (Bankr. N.D. Ga. March 14, 2014) (Sacca) - Where the grace period to redeem pawned property expired prior to the filing of the Chapter 13 petition, the property was not property of the estate and the debtor could not treat this claim as a secured claim.
Case Summary
Ms. Howard had pawned two automobiles with USA Title. She had signed a pawn contract for a 2006 Suzuki in exchange for $1,856.18 and signed a second pawn contract . . .
It looks like you are not signed in or registered! This content is only available to members.
Or sign in below:
Related Articles
New Trustee Named
Fraud Imputed to Partner – Bartenwerfer v. Buckley
From the Editor – Claims
Foreclosure Sales as Fraudulent Transfers: Study Summary
Georgia Attorney Sanctioned in Debtor’s Seventh Chapter 13 Case
Critical Case Comment – Pay the TAXES!
A Confirmed Plan with a Marijuana Wrinkle
4 Reasons to Keep Time Records No One Discusses
Creditors’ Rights and Debtors’ Protections at the Intersection of Consumer Bankruptcy and UCC Article 9
Trustee Cannot Require Debtor to Treat Nondischargeable Student Loan Debts in a Separate Class