By Lawrence R. Ahern III, Brown & Ahern (Nashville, TN) Introduction In Ritzen Group, Inc. v. Jackson Masonry, LLC (In re Jackson Masonry, LLC),1 the Sixth Circuit reviewed circuit authority on finality of orders for appellate purposes and affirmed the district court's dismissal of an appeal from an order denying stay relief. The Court of Appeals said that, under 28...
From the Editor – Reopening Closed Case
Print This Article
Link to Post:
By The Honorable William Houston Brown (Retired)
Debtors could reopen case to avoid judgment lien. Rejecting judgment creditor’s argument that debtors waited too long to seek lien avoidance, the court held that reopening a closed Chapter 13 case for the purpose of debtors seeking lien avoidance was common and not prohibited. The confirmed plan had treated the creditor as unsecured and it did not object; moreover, the creditor had received payments as unsecured, and it was judicially estopped from asserting a secured claim. The estoppel effect outweighed any delay by the debtors. In re . . .
It looks like you are not signed in or registered! This content is only available to members.
Or sign in below:
Related Articles
The Change to Chapter 13 Law I’d Most Like to See?
No Free Car for a Lien Avoidance
From the Supreme Court
Til Debt and Rikers Do Us Part
Malicious Acts, Undischarged Debts: A Lesson in Accountability
Teaching Old Dogs New Tricks: New Ideas for Treatment of Student Loans in Bankruptcy
When Supervisors Supervise the Supervision of Supervisors
New Federal Guidance on Discharging Student Loans in Bankruptcy Is a Game Changer
Unscheduled Creditor May Not File a Late Proof of Claim
Supreme Court Agrees to Revisit Finality of Orders in Bankruptcy