The NACTT Academy offers a comprehensive community for bankruptcy professionals seeking to advance their education in consumer bankruptcy.
ConsiderChapter13.org offers a forum to advance continuing education of consumer bankruptcy via access to insightful articles, informative webinars, and the latest industry news. Join now to benefit from expert resources and stay informed.
These informative sessions are led by industry experts and cover a range of consumer bankruptcy topics.
Written by industry experts, these articles provide in-depth analysis and practical guidance on consumer bankruptcy topics.
The Academy is the go-to source for the latest news and analysis in the Chapter 13 bankruptcy industry.
From the Editor – Discharge Injunction
Print This Article
Link to Post:
By The Honorable William Houston Brown (Retired)
Bank’s two letters attempting debt collection violated discharge injunction. Chapter 7 debtors reopened their case and court found that a bank, with knowledge of the prior discharge, had mailed two letters to debtors that were attempts to collect the discharged debt. The second letter was sent after debtors’ attorney had written the bank that it should cease collection efforts. The debtors’ actual damages were their $3,050 attorney fees, and $500 punitive sanction was awarded, reduced from the $100,000 sanction requested by debtors. In re Szenes . . .
It looks like you are not signed in or registered! This content is only available to members.
Or Sign In Below:
Related Articles
Unscheduled Creditor May Not File a Late Proof of Claim
Critical Case Comment – Post-Petition 401(k) Contributions ARE Disposable Income
Win Now, Wreck Later: A Tale of Bankruptcy and Mortgage Servicing
Retirement of the Honorable Guy R. Humphrey
Critical Case Comment – Discharged Junior in 7 Survives in 13
Bankruptcy Court Broadly Interprets “Engaged in Business” Requirement for Subchapter V Eligibility
Critical Case Comment
From the Editor
Bankruptcy Courts Grapple with the “COVID-19 Discharge”
To Conduit, Or Not To Conduit? That Is The Question. Or Less Shakespearean: “Conduit Mortgage Case Law”