As a follow-up to The Academy’s December 3, 2023, issue, three Emeritus Trustees weighed in. The 12/3/23 issue included Cathy Moran’s Chapter 13 NoLook Fees: The Horns of a Dilemma and Trustee Hildebrand’s Critical Case Comment, You Gotta Fix Your Own Screw-ups, On Your Own Dime. You may also want to take note of comments on each article and add your own. Today, we offer the thoughts of two additional Emeritus Trustees. Thus a follow-up to our follow-up. 😊
From the Editor – Classification and Cure of Defaults
Print This Article
Link to Post:
By The Honorable William Houston Brown (Retired)
Debtor’s right to cure is governed by § 1322(b) rather than § 108(b). The debtors had entered into a land contract, which contained a provision that on default of payments for thirty days, the entire balance was due on written notice from the seller. The debtors failed to make a prepetition balloon payment, and the sellers obtained a strict foreclosure judgment, which established a redemption period (Under applicable Wisconsin law, the strict foreclosure judgment was not a “sale.”). The Chapter 13 case was filed and the proposed plan . . .
It looks like you are not signed in or registered! This content is only available to members.
Or sign in below:
Related Articles
What About Conditional Confirmation?
Recent Study of New Student Loan Discharge Process Shows Increase in Loan Litigation in Bankruptcy
Meet the Newest Trustee
Critical Case Comment – In the Windfalls Category
Assessable Yet Not Assessed Taxes Could Cost You a Malpractice Claim
Chapter 13 No-Look Fees – Additional Thoughts
Critical Case Comment – No POC, No Money
Chapter 13 Trustees Must Return Percentage Fees. Yea, Now What?
Ask Ms. Ps & Qs
The Hardest-Won Skill of a Bankruptcy Attorney