From the Editor

From the Editor – Classification and Cure of Defaults

By The Honorable William Houston Brown (Retired)

Separate classification of student loan debt denied. The debtors’ plan proposed to separately classify student loan debts, on which the debtors were current, paying the ongoing monthly payments directly, and the court discussed the split of authority on whether separate classification and payment under § 1322(b)(5) is subject to the unfair discrimination test of § 1322(b)(1), citing Prof. Susan Hauser, Separate Classification of Student Loan Debt in Chapter 13, 32 Am. Bankr. Inst. J. 38 (2013). The court agreed with the majority view that §§ 1322 . . .

It looks like you are not signed in or registered! This content is only available to members.

Or Sign In Below:

No Author Biography has been linked to this Article.

Trustee’s Broad Duty to Disclose Information to Interested Parties under Section 704(a)(7) of the Bankruptcy Code – Law Review by Jose Cardoz

Edward C. Boltz

October 13, 2024

While this article actually looks at Chapter 11 trustees, there are implications for 13 trustees here as well.

Critical Case Comment – Pro Se Debtor Sanctioned

November 21, 2021

By Henry E. Hildebrand, III, Chapter 13 Standing Trustee for the Middle District of TN (Nashville) Where pro se debtors filed numerous groundless complaints and made specious allegations against their former counsel, sanctions under Rule 9011 were appropriate notwithstanding the fact that the debtors were now acting pro se. (Hopkins) In re Jones, 2021 WL 4168110 (Bankr. S.D. O.H., Sept....

Members

I Feel A Change Coming On (Song by Bob Dylan, 1964)

January 24, 2021

By Merideth Akers, CPA, PHR, Comptroller for Bradford W. Caraway (Birmingham, AL) The Covid-19 pandemic postponed the 2020 Masters Golf Tournament, originally scheduled for early spring. It was eventually held November 12th through 15th. The winner was Dustin Johnson. Additionally, the 2020 Wimbledon Tennis Tournament was cancelled for the first time since 1945 (due to World War II). For the...

Members

The Dangers of Extending a Plan Too Long – Or Alternatively, Why Take as Little Time as Possible

April 26, 2020

By Joseph A. Bledsoe, III, Chapter 13 Standing Trustee for the Eastern District of North Carolina (New Bern) Under section 1113(b)(1)(C) of the CARES Act, upon the request of a debtor, and after notice and a hearing, a plan confirmed may be extended up to 7 years from the date the first payment under the original plan came due if...

Members

Critical Case Comment – Pay the TAXES!

Henry E. Hildebrand, III

July 10, 2022

Failure of Chapter 13 debtors to satisfy post-petition property tax payments to the county, specifically required in the debtors’ Chapter 13 plan, renders the debtors ineligible for a discharge, even where the debtors proposed a loan modification to repay the mortgage creditor which had advanced the post-petition taxes. (Rodriguez) In re Villarreal, 2022 WL 1102223 (Bankr. S.D. Tex. April 12,...

Members

Critical Case Comment – If Objection, Arrears Gotta’ Be Equal Monthly Installments

Henry E. Hildebrand, III

March 12, 2023

When a mortgage servicer objects to the plan based on its failure to pay mortgage arrears in equal monthly payments, § 1325(a)(5)(B) requires the debtor to amend to pay the arrears in equal monthly payments. (Hanan) In re Randell, 638 B.R. 104 (Bankr. E.D. Wis. January 19, 2022) Case Summary Ms. Randell proposed a rather conventional Chapter 13 plan, seeking...

Members

Claims: Transfers, Address Changes, and Payee Switches – Oh My!

The NACTT Emeritus Trustees

April 30, 2023

In any given year Chapter 13 Trustees administer 400,000 to 500,000 cases and distribute almost $5 billion to creditors. A critical duty for trustees is to be sure that distributions are correctly delivered to an allowed claimant. 11 USC § 501 governs the filing of a proof of claim and 11 USC § 502 sets forth the requirements for allowance...

Members

Constitutional Interpretation and State Bankruptcy Laws: Chief Justice Marshall on Sturges v. Crowninshield (1819)

M. Jonathan Hayes

March 31, 2024

Launching a new feature - Supreme Court Corner - Jon Hayes will periodically share a look at a historical bankruptcy case. As the title indicates, Sturges v. Crowninshield looks at state bankruptcy law in the absence of federal law.

Members

Critical Case Comment– Secured Creditor Granted Relief from Stay. But, Wait There’s More . . . No Proof of Claim.

Henry E. Hildebrand, III

July 24, 2022

Secured creditor in a Chapter 13 case entitled to relief from the stay due to lack of adequate protection where the creditor neglects to file a proof of claim and, as a consequent, received no payments under a Chapter 13 plan. (Conley) Weyer v. Valley Communities Credit Union, 2022 WL 1597293 (W.D. Wis. May 19, 2022) Case Summary Dana and...

Members

March 24, 2019

By Wm. Houston Brown, United States Bankruptcy Judge (Retired) Discharge - Direct mortgage payments unpaid by debtor were not “provided for” in plan. The confirmed plan stated that the debtor would directly pay two home mortgages to the credit union, but there was no specification of payment terms or other treatment of those mortgages. At the time of confirmation, the...

Members

From the Editor – Classification and Cure of Defaults

Link to Post:

It looks like you are not signed in or registered! This content is only available to members.

Or Sign In Below:

Related Articles

Trustee’s Broad Duty to Disclose Information to Interested Parties under Section 704(a)(7) of the Bankruptcy Code – Law Review by Jose Cardoz

Critical Case Comment – Pro Se Debtor Sanctioned

I Feel A Change Coming On (Song by Bob Dylan, 1964)

The Dangers of Extending a Plan Too Long – Or Alternatively, Why Take as Little Time as Possible

Critical Case Comment – Pay the TAXES!

Critical Case Comment – If Objection, Arrears Gotta’ Be Equal Monthly Installments

Claims: Transfers, Address Changes, and Payee Switches – Oh My!

Constitutional Interpretation and State Bankruptcy Laws: Chief Justice Marshall on Sturges v. Crowninshield (1819)

Critical Case Comment– Secured Creditor Granted Relief from Stay. But, Wait There’s More . . . No Proof of Claim.

From the Editor

Academy

Members

Website

Legal

Looking to Become a Member?

Webinars

Member Articles

Industry News

To get started, please let us know which of these best fits your current position: