ConsiderChapter13.org offers a forum to advance continuing education of consumer bankruptcy via access to insightful articles, informative webinars, and the latest industry news. Join now to benefit from expert resources and stay informed.
These informative sessions are led by industry experts and cover a range of consumer bankruptcy topics.
Written by industry experts, these articles provide in-depth analysis and practical guidance on consumer bankruptcy topics.
The Academy is the go-to source for the latest news and analysis in the Chapter 13 bankruptcy industry.
From the Editor – Claims
Print This Article
Link to Post:
By The Honorable William Houston Brown (Retired)
Inconsistency on proof of claim negated prima facie validity and preemption of state law. Examining whether secured creditor was “debt collector” under California’s Rosenthal Fair Debt Collection Practices Act, and concluding that Act’s definition was broad enough to include the creditor, the debtor’s complaint under that Act was preempted by the Bankruptcy Code’s claim objection procedures. Also, the debtor’s RESPA claim was similarly preempted. However, the proof of claim contained inconsistencies on its face as to the amount of the claim, negating the prima . . .
It looks like you are not signed in or registered! This content is only available to members.
Or Sign In Below:
Related Articles
From the Editor – Claims
Passing of Affable, Humanitarian Trustee
Creditors’ Rights and Debtors’ Protections at the Intersection of Consumer Bankruptcy and UCC Article 9 – Part IV
Retirement of the Honorable John E. Hoffman, Jr., Chief Judge
Plan Modifications and Below Median Debtors
From the Editor
We Love You Dan (“Stingray”) Brunner!!
Critical Case Comment
Supreme Court to Consider Judicial Estoppel
Critical Case Comment