ConsiderChapter13.org offers a forum to advance continuing education of consumer bankruptcy via access to insightful articles, informative webinars, and the latest industry news. Join now to benefit from expert resources and stay informed.
These informative sessions are led by industry experts and cover a range of consumer bankruptcy topics.
Written by industry experts, these articles provide in-depth analysis and practical guidance on consumer bankruptcy topics.
The Academy is the go-to source for the latest news and analysis in the Chapter 13 bankruptcy industry.
From the Editor – Claims
Print This Article
Link to Post:
By The Honorable William Houston Brown (Retired)
Inconsistency on proof of claim negated prima facie validity and preemption of state law. Examining whether secured creditor was “debt collector” under California’s Rosenthal Fair Debt Collection Practices Act, and concluding that Act’s definition was broad enough to include the creditor, the debtor’s complaint under that Act was preempted by the Bankruptcy Code’s claim objection procedures. Also, the debtor’s RESPA claim was similarly preempted. However, the proof of claim contained inconsistencies on its face as to the amount of the claim, negating the prima . . .
It looks like you are not signed in or registered! This content is only available to members.
Or sign in below:
Related Articles
Fixing Broke: Consumer Bankruptcy Diary
Ordinary Heroes Deliver Second Chances with Bankruptcy
Supreme Court Corner – No Lien Stripping in Chapter 7
Retirement: No Court Scheduling, Fewer Meetings, More Planning
An LLC Is Not You
Three-Way Split: Dividing the Cost of Neglected Notices
Critical Case Comment–Should’a Returned the Car
Memories of a Chapter XIII Trustee
Bankruptcy Courts Grapple with the “COVID-19 Discharge” – Appendix B
Critical Case Comment