Intro: What is a Fulton ruling? When Chicago v Fulton (In re Fulton), 141 S Ct. 585 (Sup Ct, 2021) was first decided by the Supreme Court, there was a consensus among bankruptcy attorneys that the erosion of the automatic stay with regard to turnover was only about cars. That is, Fulton was a narrow ruling that was only about...
From the Editor – Claims
Print This Article
Link to Post:
By The Honorable William Houston Brown (Retired)
Non-debtor spouse has claim for equitable distribution of marital property when parties were in prepetition divorce proceeding. On a direct appeal, the Third Circuit decided the issue of whether a non-debtor spouse has an allowable claim for equitable distribution of marital property in a divorce proceeding that was pending at the time the other spouse filed Chapter 7. Stating that the issue had divided courts in the Circuit, the court looked to the definition of a “claim” under § 101(5)(A), with the spouse’s interest, “at . . .
It looks like you are not signed in or registered! This content is only available to members.
Or sign in below:
Related Articles
From the Editor – Claims
Here’s How a Name Change Affects a Tax Return
Hanging Paragraph, Cars for Non-Personal Use, and PMSI
Atlanta Debtor Attorney/Firm Sanctioned
After Chicago v Fulton: Not Only Cars – A Survey of Fulton Rulings and a Weakened Automatic Stay
From the IRS – Using Strong Password Is a Strong Defense Against Identity Thieves
Home Equity Conversion Mortgages – Reversal of Fortune
From the Editor
FFIEC Issues Statement on Examination Principles Related to Valuation Discrimination and Bias in Residential Lending
Overruled: The Human Toll of Too Much Law – A Book Review