By Lawrence R. Ahern, III, Brown & Ahern (Nashville, TN) Part IV Two More Things Trustees Should Know About the Small Business Reorganization Act of 2019 Introduction Four bankruptcy-related bills were enacted during the 116th Congress and signed into law on August 23, 2019.1 The legislation affected both business and consumer cases. One bill, the Small Business Reorganization Act of...
From the Editor – Discharge and Dischargeability
Print This Article
Link to Post:
By The Honorable William Houston Brown (Retired)
Marital settlement agreement’s obligation to hold spouse harmless from credit card debt gave rise to implied indemnity right for purposes of § 523(a)(15). Under California law, the Chapter 7 debtor’s promise in marital settlement agreement to pay credit card debt and hold wife harmless was enforceable, even though the agreement did not include indemnification language. Section 523(a)(15) does not require that the obligation be paid directly to the former spouse, and under California law, the debtor’s obligation was an implied indemnification claim. The . . .
It looks like you are not signed in or registered! This content is only available to members.
Or sign in below:
Related Articles
An Update on Student Debt Relief and What this Means for Chapter 13 Practitioners
Social Media Scams: Con Artists Target the Vulnerable
Important Research Survey
Yet Another Arrow in the Quiver of the “Less Than Honest Debtor”?
Two More Things Trustees Should Know About the Small Business Reorganization Act of 2019
May the Chapter 13 Trustee Keep Fees Paid Before Dismissal? – Part 2
When Laws Collide, You Need the Right Word
Gambled and Lost – Again
Foreclosure Sales as Fraudulent Transfers: Study Summary
Who Gets Grannie’s Cash – Grannie or the Bankruptcy Trustee?