By Cathy Moran, Esq., Moran Law Group (Redwood City, CA) On its face, Diaz (Diaz v. Viegelahn, No. 19-50982 (5th Cir. Aug. 26, 2020)) is a pretty straightforward decision that struck down a local form plan as violating a below-median income debtor's right to use her tax refund to finance necessary expenses for maintenance and support. On a deeper level,...
From the Editor – Chapter 7 Issues
Print This Article
Link to Post:
By The Honorable William Houston Brown (Retired)
Priority Claims: Payment of priority, nondischargeable tax did not subrogate debtors to rights of tax authority. In their schedules, the Chapter 7 debtors admitted liability for prepetition sales and withholding taxes, which fell within § 507(a)(8)(C) and § 523(a)(1)(A)’s exception from discharge. The case administration continued after the grant of discharge, and the debtors had negotiated with the state an amount of nondischargeable taxes, which they had substantially paid. The debtors then sought reimbursement from the trustee of their tax payments, but adopting the . . .
It looks like you are not signed in or registered! This content is only available to members.
Or sign in below:
Related Articles
FFIEC Issues Statement on Examination Principles Related to Valuation Discrimination and Bias in Residential Lending
Meet a New Trustee
Critical Case Comment – Creditor Not Required to Dismiss Prepetition Nonbankruptcy Action
Diaz: Is it Really a Tax Refund?
Be Sure Your Sins Will Find You Out
Critical Case Comment– Reverse Mortgage May be Modified
Honoring Jan Sensenich
How Forensic Accountants Add Value While Investigate Claims & Fraud – A Study
Stop the Chaos and Fix Client Communication with Smart Tech
Plan Modifications and Below Median Debtors