The NACTT Academy offers a comprehensive community for bankruptcy professionals seeking to advance their education in consumer bankruptcy.
ConsiderChapter13.org offers a forum to advance continuing education of consumer bankruptcy via access to insightful articles, informative webinars, and the latest industry news. Join now to benefit from expert resources and stay informed.
These informative sessions are led by industry experts and cover a range of consumer bankruptcy topics.
Written by industry experts, these articles provide in-depth analysis and practical guidance on consumer bankruptcy topics.
The Academy is the go-to source for the latest news and analysis in the Chapter 13 bankruptcy industry.
From the Editor – Eligibility
Print This Article
Link to Post:
By The Honorable William Houston Brown (Retired)
Debt limits are not jurisdictional and are subject to waiver. In a case filed in 2010, then dismissed for failure to file a plan but reinstated, the bankruptcy court heard evidence in 2012 on a creditor’s motion to dismiss for lack of eligibility. By the time the creditor filed its motion to dismiss, asserting that the debtors exceeded the unsecured limit, the debtors had maintained plan payments for two years, and the creditor had not moved to dismiss when it filed its plan objection. Finding that a majority . . .
It looks like you are not signed in or registered! This content is only available to members.
Or Sign In Below:
Related Articles
What Does the Bankruptcy Code Say About Interest and Unsecured Debts
Postpetition Borrowing by a Consumer Debtor in Chapter 13 – Part 1 of 2
What, Exactly, Is the Trustee’s Percentage Fee
Millions of ITINs Set to Expire in 2019; IRS Says Renew Early to Prevent Refund Delays
Chapter 13 Trustee Duties, Powers, And Limitations – Part 7
The Untouchables – Starring Social Security Income
Small Business Reorganization Act…(“SBRA”) H.R. 3311 – Part Three
Just the Facts, Ma’am – Consolidated Appropriations Act, December 27, 2020
Critical Case Comment – Repeat: No Fee Splitting
Critical Case Comment