By Henry E. Hildebrand, III, Chapter 13 Standing Trustee for the Middle District of Tennessee Mortgage creditor may not withdraw a notice of fees, costs, and charges filed in a case after the supplement to the claim has been challenged without court approval; the allowance of such a notice will not be permitted where a state statute forbids it. Quicken...
From the Editor – Attorneys and Fees
Print This Article
Link to Post:
By The Honorable William Houston Brown (Retired)
Debtor did not require court approval of special counsel. Under §§ 1303 and 1306(b), the Chapter 13 debtor had possession of state-law cause of action against a creditor for wrongful repossession. The debtor and the Chapter 13 trustee have concurrent authority over estate property, subject to § 363’s exclusive authority to the debtor to use, sell or lease property. A debtor is not a “trustee” for purposes of § 327, and the debtor was not required to seek court approval of employment of special counsel; however, such counsel must . . .
It looks like you are not signed in or registered! This content is only available to members.
Or sign in below:
Related Articles
Why the FCRA’s Dispute Machinery So Often Breaks Down – A Practical Primer for Bankruptcy Counsel
From Suspension to Step Plans: Trustees Share What Sticks
Escrow 101 – Part 2 of 3
Sua Sponte Sanctions Held to Higher Standard
From the Editor – Avoidance
From the Editor – Claims
Creditors’ Rights and Debtors’ Protections at the Intersection of Consumer Bankruptcy and UCC Article 9
Critical Case Comment
Legal Aid and Who Are Our Chapter 13 “Customers”
No Room for Error? Determining Whether Your “Secured” Creditor Has a Fatally Deficient UCC-1