By William Houston Brown, Adviser, Academy for Consumer Bankruptcy Education, Inc. and Lawrence R. Ahern, III, Brown and Ahern (Nashville, TN) In two February opinions, the Supreme Court addressed issues that appear in bankruptcy cases, one dealing with a common practice of entering nunc pro tunc orders and the other affecting determination of property rights under state law. In a...
From the Editor – Discharge
Print This Article
Link to Post:
By The Honorable William Houston Brown (Retired)
Ineligibility for loan restructure supported § 523(a)(8) undue hardship. The Chapter 13 debtor had cosigned student loans for former spouse, and the facts that the debtor was not the borrower and that the loans were not government-issued prevented the debtor’s eligibility to restructure the loans under the extended loan repayment provisions of 34 C.F.R. § 685.208. Therefore, the Brunner test was satisfied for undue hardship purposes. The Education Resources Institute, Inc. v. Zumbro (In re Zumbro), ___ Fed.Appx. ____, 2013 WL . . .
It looks like you are not signed in or registered! This content is only available to members.
Or sign in below:
Related Articles
Artificial Intelligence and Bankruptcy Law
Minding the Post-Confirmation Gate: Creditors Gotta’ Get It Right the First Time
Negotiating Plan Confirmation with Secured Creditors – Issues Involving Balloon Payments and Other Mortgage Loans Subject to Modification Under § 1322(c) – Part 1 of 3
Early Christmas Present for Chapter 13 Bankruptcy Attorneys
Rules, Means-Test Amounts and Miscellaneous Fees: Changes Wrap Up 2020
Ask Ms. Ps & Qs
Two Supreme Court Decisions with Effects on Bankruptcy Practice
The Dilemma of Non-Filing Claims
Motions to Extend or Impose the Automatic Stay
Quick Tips to Make You a PowerPoint Master – Effective Use of PowerPoint