The NACTT Academy offers a comprehensive community for bankruptcy professionals seeking to advance their education in consumer bankruptcy.
ConsiderChapter13.org offers a forum to advance continuing education of consumer bankruptcy via access to insightful articles, informative webinars, and the latest industry news. Join now to benefit from expert resources and stay informed.
These informative sessions are led by industry experts and cover a range of consumer bankruptcy topics.
Written by industry experts, these articles provide in-depth analysis and practical guidance on consumer bankruptcy topics.
The Academy is the go-to source for the latest news and analysis in the Chapter 13 bankruptcy industry.
From the Editor – Discharge
Print This Article
Link to Post:
By The Honorable William Houston Brown (Retired)
Marital relationship did not constitute express or technical trust for purposes of § 523(a)(4). Under Washington common law, the marital relationship does not constitute the required trust for purposes of § 523(a)(4); therefore, the Chapter 13 debtor did not commit defalcation of a fiduciary duty as to management of community property during the marriage. Mele v. Mele (In re Mele), 501 B.R. 357 (BAP 9th Cir. 2013).
________________________________
The Honorable William Houston Brown retired in 2006 as a United States Bankruptcy Judge for the . . .
It looks like you are not signed in or registered! This content is only available to members.
Or Sign In Below:
Related Articles
The Chapter 13 Business Model
Escrow 102 – Part 1 of 4
Student Loans Debacle-Part II: Failure to Forgive – The Ticking Time-Bomb
Will Artificial Intelligence Run Wild on the Legal Profession?
Use All Channels to Educate Bankruptcy Debtors
The Hanging Paragraph – Hanging on Every Word Part 4 of 4
2022 Bankruptcy Procedure Year in Review: Revised Statute and Rules and Selected Cases Part 9 More from the Supreme Court: MOAC Mall Holdings LLC v. Transform Holdco LLC
From the Editor
2022 Bankruptcy Procedure Year in Review: Revised Statute and Rules and Selected Cases Part 5 – Supreme Court Activity
Critical Case Comment