Introduction In In re Village Apothecary, Inc.,1 the Sixth Circuit recently cut an attorney's fee by half, where the services were not successful. The panel held that the results obtained (or, actually, the lack of results) justified the dramatic reduction of the fees of attorneys for a Chapter 7 trustee. In Part 1, we looked at . . . It...
From the Editor – Chapter 13 Issues
Print This Article
Link to Post:
By The Honorable William Houston Brown (Retired)
Disposable Income: Step up payments required after completion of 401(k) loan. Sustaining the trustee’s objection to confirmation and citing the majority position, when the debtors would complete repayment of a 401(k) plan loan within twenty-four months, they were required to increase plan payments, since the funds previously used to repay the loan would become disposable income. Repayment of the loan is a known or virtually certain change in financial circumstances under Hamilton v. Lanning. The debtors’ argument that they needed the extra funds . . .
It looks like you are not signed in or registered! This content is only available to members.
Or sign in below:
Related Articles
Means Test Webinar
The Trustee Is Not Your Collection Agent
Tax Time Guide: Contribute to an IRA by April 15 to claim it on 2018 tax returns
Are Monthly Newsletters to Clients Beneficial? Heck Yeah!
MFA – Click It or Ticket
Critical Case Comment
The Effect of “Success” (or the Lack of It) on Attorneys’ Fees Part 2: In re Village Apothecary, Inc.
Substantial Contribution Claims
The Mystery of the Disappearing Means Test Deduction
Bankruptcy Lawyer Must Have Otherworldly Powers