Michael Ford Named Trustee

Michael Ford graduated from the University of Alabama, School of Law in 1974. After graduation, he moved to Tuscumbia, Alabama, where he met the, then Standing Chapter 13 Trustee, William N. (Newt) Pitts. Trustee Pitts took Mike under his wing and taught him all things Chapter 13. Prior to becoming officially employed by Trustee Pitts, Mike represented both debtors and creditors. In 1998 Mike became part-time staff attorney to Trustee Pitts. He remained in that capacity until Trustee Pitts’ retirement in 2009. (Trustee Pitts died later that year.) At the time of his retirement, Trustee Pitts’ remaining cases were absorbed by Standing Chapter 13 Trustee Philip Geddes. Mike served as part-time staff attorney to Trustee Geddes until his retirement in June of 2013.

Linda Gore was appointed Interim Trustee in June of 2013. Pending Mike’s appointment as the Standing Trustee, he served as Staff Attorney to Trustee Gore. Trustee Gore was a tremendous resource, training and mentoring Mike. Mike is quoted as saying, “I can’t thank Linda enough for her great leadership during her interim trusteeship and for continuing to consult with me. She has been an invaluable resource.”

Michael Ford was appointed as the Standing Chapter 13 Trustee for the Northern Division of the Northern District of Alabama on April 16, 2014.

A perk of membership to the National Association of Chapter 13 Trustees (NACTT) is the Trustee Mentor Program. New Trustees have the option of consulting on any matter with a seasoned Trustee. Standing Chapter 13 Trustee from Tuscaloosa, David Cottingham, has been assigned to Mike under this program. Mike and other new Trustees are reassured of their success by this program.

When interviewed, Mike said “I am very excited about this opportunity to continue service in the Chapter 13 environment. I am a believer in Chapter 13, and have been one since my first trustee showed me how to fill out the forms. I will always believe this is the fairest and most efficient way to help honest but financially distressed people deal with their debts. In law school the bankruptcy course was optional and taught only during the summer. I’ve always been thankful that I took that course.”

No Author Biography has been linked to this Article.

Ask Ms. Ps & Qs

Nancy B. Rapoport

November 26, 2023

“ . . . how can I not write about an opinion that begins, “This is a case of sue first and ask questions later”? We all know that Judge Christopher Klein has a way with words and a precise and methodical way of approaching statutory analysis.”

Members

Just the Facts, Ma’am – Consolidated Appropriations Act, December 27, 2020

January 10, 2021

By The Honorable William Houston Brown (Retired) This legislation includes several bankruptcy-related provisions, in addition to government funding and other COVID relief. Consumer bankruptcy issues are addressed in Title X of the Act, section 1001, which amends Bankruptcy Code § 541(b)’s exclusions from property of the estate, adding subsection 11 for certain coronavirus relief, defined as “recovery rebates made under...

Members

Sub V Update

Paul W. Bonapfel

April 14, 2024

Many of you are familiar with the extensive outline on Sub Chapter V that the Honorable Paul W. Bonapfel, United States Bankruptcy Court for the Northern District of Georgia, produces. This is a FREE resource and is freshly updated!! Thank you Judge Bonapfel!

Consumer Bankruptcy Reform Act of 2020 Introduced

December 13, 2020

By Hon. William Houston Brown, Adviser, Academy for Consumer Bankruptcy Education and Margaret A. Burks, Chapter 13 Trustee (Cincinnati, OH) Senator Elizabeth Warren (D. Mass.) and House Judiciary Committee Chairman Jerrold Nadler (D. N.Y.) have introduced the Consumer Bankruptcy Reform Act of 2020. Introduction of the Act is only the beginning of the legislative process, and no action toward enactment...

Memorial Day 2023

The Academy

May 28, 2023

Memorial Day 2023 Honoring the Sacrifices of All Who Served

From the Editor – Attorney Sanctioned

June 14, 2020

By The Honorable William Houston Brown (Retired) Attorney sanctioned for filing identical schedules in two cases without updating financial information. The same attorney represented a debtor in two cases filed sixteen months apart, but the attorney filed essentially identical schedules in both cases, violating Rule 9011 by failing to make reasonable inquiry before filing the second case. The schedules in...

Members

From the Editor

September 27, 2020

By The Honorable William Houston Brown (Retired) Debtors’ attorney fees not authorized under Equal Access to Justice Act (EAJA). Although the Chapter 13 debtors had prevailed before the Ninth Circuit, In re Sisk, 962 F.3d 1133 (9th Cir. 2020), their application for attorney fees as prevailing parties under EAJA was denied. That Act did not authorize awards of attorney fees...

Members

Critical Case Comment – Service Counts

Henry E. Hildebrand, III

October 2, 2022

Debtor’s filing application to extend or impose the automatic stay must comply with the service requirements of Rule 7004 as to all creditors or the stay cannot be imposed or extended. (Johnson) In re Hardy, 2022 WL 1196963 (C.D. Cal. April 21, 2022) Case Summary Kimberly Hardy had a long history in consumer bankruptcy. She had filed eight cases, including...

Members

Duty to Update Trustee Regarding Changes Post-Plan Confirmation

Daryl J. Smith

April 23, 2023

Is there a duty to inform the trustee about changes post-plan confirmation? Yes. There is an inherent duty for the consumer debtor to update the trustee on any and all material changes, particularly windfalls, post plan confirmation. In a very recent case, In Re Robinson, the United States Trustee moved to dismiss debtor’s chapter 13 case because the debtor received...

Members

Critical Case Comment – Funds on Hand at Dismissal Go to Debtor. Not So Fast. 13 Trustee May Be Subject to State Court Proceedings

Henry E. Hildebrand, III

January 16, 2022

While a 13 trustee is partially insulated by the Barton doctrine from being dragged into state court, if a movant seeks authority from the Bankruptcy Court to pursue the trustee and satisfies the conditions of the Barton doctrine, the trustee may be subject to state court judicial proceedings. (Hall) In re Alexander Louis Bednar, 2021 WL 1625399 (Bankr. W.D. Okla....

Members