By Henry E. Hildebrand, III, Chapter 13 Standing Trustee (Nashville, TN) Exemptions in consumer cases have always presented difficult problems for practitioners and trustees. In a bow to states’ rights, the Bankruptcy Act of 1898 deferred to exemptions created by state law. When BAPCPA was enacted in 2005, Congress continued the practice of allowing each state to “opt out” of...
From the Editor – Avoidance Actions
Print This Article
Link to Post:
By The Honorable William Houston Brown (Retired)
Chapter 7 trustee’s abandonment did not deprive court of jurisdiction to hear § 522(f) lien avoidance. The bankruptcy court retained authority under § 522(f) to hear the Chapter 7 debtor’s motion to avoid judicial lien, notwithstanding the trustee’s prior abandonment of the cause of action. Under 28 U.S.C.A. § 1334(e)(1), the court had jurisdiction over property of the estate and of the debtor. Ramos v. Negron (In re Ramos), 498 B.R. 401 (BAP 1st Cir. 2013).
_______________________________
The Honorable . . .
It looks like you are not signed in or registered! This content is only available to members.
Or sign in below:
Related Articles
Artificial Intelligence in Bankruptcy Law: A Modern Legal Frontier
One Woman’s Opinion
Critical Case Comment – Relief from Stay, Check; But Better Act Fast
Advising Consumer Clients About Credit Scoring – Some Questions
Does Tax Sale Purchaser Hold Tax Claimor Secured Debt? Divided Seventh Circuit Says Tax Claim
What Else Does the Code Say About Interest and Unsecured Debts?
Consumers Are Consuming Cash at an Unsustainable Rate
ABI Commission on Consumer Bankruptcy – Recommendations Related to Exemptions
Representing Elderly Clients in Bankruptcy – Part 1 of 3
Homesteads in New York State: Don’t Put the Cart Before the Horse