Critical Case Comment

-

Link to Post:

By Kevin R. Anderson, Chapter 13 Trustee for the District of Utah

CASE SUMMARY

Pliler v. Stearns (In re Pliler), 2014 WL 1259569 (4th Cir. March 28, 2014): On their Form 22C, the above-median debtors showed negative monthly disposable income. The plan proposed a zero return to nonpriority unsecured creditors and included “early termination” language allowing the case to be deemed completed within 55 months. The bankruptcy court denied confirmation unless the plan required payments for the applicable commitment period of 60 months. The debtors appealed arguing that the . . .

It looks like you are not signed in or registered! This content is only available to members.

Or sign in below:

No Author Biography has been linked to this Article.

Related Articles

leffler4

The Uneasy Co-Existence of Federal and State Consumer Remedies in Bankruptcy Cases – the Fourth Circuit Weighs In

October 15, 2023
“Why do I need the FDCPA if there’s already a remedy under Rule 3001?” This is what the bankruptcy judge asked me when I brought an adversary proceeding against a claims buyer, alleging potential class claims under both the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act (“FDCPA”) and Bankruptcy Rule 3001(c)(2). The defendant had a business practice of filing high volumes of...
View Article
Members
Copy of Hildebrand-2016

Revved Up and Ready to Go But Not Good Faith

August 4, 2024
Just because a Chapter 13 plan satisfies the disposable income test does not mean it passes the good faith test particularly if luxury items are involved.
View Article
Members

The Extent of 362(c)(3)’s Stay Termination: Bankruptcy Court Adds an Argument to the Debate

June 28, 2020
By Lawrence R. Ahern III, Brown & Ahern (Nashville, TN) Introduction In In re Dao,1 Bankruptcy Judge Christopher Klein on May 11 ruled on an issue on which the circuits are split and certiorari is pending.2 Judge Klein agreed with the majority view that, under paragraph 362(c)(3) of the Bankruptcy Code, the automatic stay terminated 30 days after the order...
View Article
Members
Copy of Hildebrand-2016

Critical Case Comment – You Gotta Tell SOMEBODY!

December 18, 2022
Where a debtor fails to disclose to the Court or the trustee a forbearance on his mortgage that he was to pay directly, the Court would grant the trustee’s motion to modify to recapture as much as possible of the surplus funds the forbearance generated. (Kenney) In re Ilyev, 2022 WL 2965029 (Bankr. E.D. Va. July 26, 2022) Case Summary...
View Article
Members

From the Editor – Discharge Injunction

May 31, 2020
By The Honorable William Houston Brown (Retired) Only bankruptcy court issuing discharge order can enforce injunction. The Fifth Circuit held that only the bankruptcy court issuing a discharge order has authority to enforce the discharge injunction. The opinion reviews pre-2005 Code provisions and current 28 U.S.C. § 1963, citing other Circuits that “have insisted on a return to the bankruptcy...
View Article
Members

Meet the Newest Trustee

February 16, 2020
Although she steps into very large shoes, Julie Philippi is a welcome addition to the Chapter 13 Trustee fraternity. Ms. Philippi was appointed as the Chapter 13 Standing Trustee for the Western District of New York on January 1, 2020. Those large shoes were left by retiring NACTT icon, Albert Mogavero. “Al” served as Standing Trustee for 42 years (yep,...
View Article
Members
Scott Waterman

Separately Classifying Student Loans in Chapter 13

May 12, 2024
Big news . . . Sneak peak . . . Coming in July . . . You are gonna want this article (just sayin’) Starting July 1st, Chapter 13 debtors in Federal Student Loan income-driven repayment plans will no longer need to classify their student loans separately to receive IDR credit. Credit towards forgiveness will be awarded for each month of trustee payments, regardless of payments made directly to the Department of Education.
View Article
Members

Critical Case Comment – Pro Se Debtor Sanctioned

November 21, 2021
By Henry E. Hildebrand, III, Chapter 13 Standing Trustee for the Middle District of TN (Nashville) Where pro se debtors filed numerous groundless complaints and made specious allegations against their former counsel, sanctions under Rule 9011 were appropriate notwithstanding the fact that the debtors were now acting pro se. (Hopkins) In re Jones, 2021 WL 4168110 (Bankr. S.D. O.H., Sept....
View Article
Members
rapoport26

Ask Ms. Ps & Qs

June 4, 2023
Dear Readers: We’re now at the season where things go a bit wacky, and one thing that can go wacky has to do with people who are represented by counsel who want to talk with you.  “Let’s cut out the middleman,” they think. After all, what harm could it be to save time? Plenty of harm, actually:  Model Rule 4.2...
View Article
Members
ahern_larry_regular

Judicial Year in Review 2021: Part 4 Selected Cases under Parts VIII and IX of the Federal Rules of Bankruptcy Procedure

December 19, 2021
Introduction Following Part 1's review of the December 1, 2021 changes in the Federal Rules of Bankruptcy Procedure, Part 2 and
View Article
Members

Looking to Become a Member?

ConsiderChapter13.org offers a forum to advance continuing education of consumer bankruptcy via access to insightful articles, informative webinars, and the latest industry news. Join now to benefit from expert resources and stay informed.

Webinars

These informative sessions are led by industry experts and cover a range of consumer bankruptcy topics.

Member Articles

Written by industry experts, these articles provide in-depth analysis and practical guidance on consumer bankruptcy topics.

Industry News

The Academy is the go-to source for the latest news and analysis in the Chapter 13 bankruptcy industry.

To get started, please let us know which of these best fits your current position:

Attorney
Trustee
Non-Profit
Government