ConsiderChapter13.org offers a forum to advance continuing education of consumer bankruptcy via access to insightful articles, informative webinars, and the latest industry news. Join now to benefit from expert resources and stay informed.
These informative sessions are led by industry experts and cover a range of consumer bankruptcy topics.
Written by industry experts, these articles provide in-depth analysis and practical guidance on consumer bankruptcy topics.
The Academy is the go-to source for the latest news and analysis in the Chapter 13 bankruptcy industry.
Critical Case Comment
Print This Article
Link to Post:
By Kevin R. Anderson, Chapter 13 Trustee for the District of Utah
CASE SUMMARY
Copeland v. Fink (In re Moore), 2014 WL 341370 (8th Cir. Jan. 31, 2014)
The debtors failed to timely file tax returns resulting in non-priority – but also nondischargeable – tax claims. The plan proposed to separately classify the tax claims and essentially pay them in full while returning $0.00 to other unsecured creditors. In the absence of such discrimination, unsecured creditors would receive a 78% dividend. The bankruptcy court found such treatment to unfairly discriminate . . .
It looks like you are not signed in or registered! This content is only available to members.
Or sign in below:
Related Articles
Unclaimed Funds in Chapter 13: Trustee Obligations and Executive Order 14247
2022 Bankruptcy Procedure Year in Review: Revised Statute and Rules and Selected Cases – Part 2 Rules Related to SBRA
From the Editor – Confirmation
Critical Case Comment–The Not DSO POC
A Practical Approach to Using Bankruptcy Rules Effectively – Part 7
Mortgage Matters in Times of COVID-19
Enforcing Chapter 13 Payroll Deductions
The Effect of “Success” (or the Lack of It) on Attorneys’ Fees Part 2: In re Village Apothecary, Inc.
From the Editor
No Constitutional Right to a Fresh Start