The NACTT Academy offers a comprehensive community for bankruptcy professionals seeking to advance their education in consumer bankruptcy.
ConsiderChapter13.org offers a forum to advance continuing education of consumer bankruptcy via access to insightful articles, informative webinars, and the latest industry news. Join now to benefit from expert resources and stay informed.
These informative sessions are led by industry experts and cover a range of consumer bankruptcy topics.
Written by industry experts, these articles provide in-depth analysis and practical guidance on consumer bankruptcy topics.
The Academy is the go-to source for the latest news and analysis in the Chapter 13 bankruptcy industry.
From the Editor’s Desk – Jurisdiction and Authority of Bankruptcy Court
Print This Article
Link to Post:
By The Honorable William Houston Brown (Retired)
Bankruptcy court had constitutional authority to determine fees but lacked authority to enter final judgment on debtor’s counterclaim under Deceptive Trade Practices Act. In ruling on fees for attorneys representing the Chapter 13 debtor (the attorneys recovered on a suit for the debtor in sufficient amount to pay all claims in full but the debtor objected to their fee applications), the bankruptcy court necessarily determined the debtor’s counterclaim for malpractice, and the bankruptcy court had constitutional authority to make factual determinations under the debtor’s Deceptive Trade . . .
It looks like you are not signed in or registered! This content is only available to members.
Or Sign In Below:
Related Articles
Meet One of Our Newest Trustees
From the Editor – Dismissal
Critical Case Comment – Although a Mess, Month-to-Month Lease Assumed
A Guide to the Small Business Reorganization Act of 2019 – Revised June 2022
Tell the Story
If You’re Gonna Bet the Farm, Maybe Play Against the House
2022 Bankruptcy Procedure Year in Review: Revised Statute and Rules and Selected Cases Part 6 Finality Versus a Residential Mortgagee: Espinosa and Nobelman Clash in the Eleventh Circuit
Critical Case Comment – Debtor Refuses to Give Location of Surrendered Mercedes; Pleads the Fifth
Changes to Form 410A Effective December 1st
Vesting of Property in the Debtor Cuts Off Creditor’s Rights, Ninth Circuit Says