ConsiderChapter13.org offers a forum to advance continuing education of consumer bankruptcy via access to insightful articles, informative webinars, and the latest industry news. Join now to benefit from expert resources and stay informed.
These informative sessions are led by industry experts and cover a range of consumer bankruptcy topics.
Written by industry experts, these articles provide in-depth analysis and practical guidance on consumer bankruptcy topics.
The Academy is the go-to source for the latest news and analysis in the Chapter 13 bankruptcy industry.
Should We Be Playing It Close To The Vest?
Print This Article
Link to Post:
By John Gustafson, Chapter 13 Trustee for the Northern District of Ohio, Western Division
A pair of recent bankruptcy decisions make strange bedfellows, while still managing to cause bankruptcy attorneys some sleepless nights. But what do the Sixth Circuit’s decision in Kimberlin, and the Rosa decision out of Hawaii have in common? On the surface – not much.
Kimberlin expands the requirement for disclosing new causes of action in an almost-completed Chapter 13, stripping a debtor of the right to sue because the schedules were not amended to list a cause of action in a 60 month . . .
It looks like you are not signed in or registered! This content is only available to members.
Or sign in below:
Related Articles
Critical Case Comment – Debtor Refuses to Give Location of Surrendered Mercedes; Pleads the Fifth
Is an Unemployment Compensation Payment Exempt?
Remember, Landlords Are Sacred Cows in Bankruptcy
Critical Case Comment – You Might as Well Plan for the Wrecked Car
U.S. Trustee Program to Implement Virtual Section 341 Meetings of Creditors Nationwide
From Jen Lee
From the Editor
Federal District Court Affirms Decision that Residential Loan Modification Does Not Alter Lien Priority in Pennsylvania
The “Snapshot” Rule – Part 1: The Circuits Begin to Line Up
Understanding Bankruptcy Rule 3002: Filing a Proof of Claim or Interest