By Lawrence R. Ahern III, Brown & Ahern (Nashville, TN) Introduction In Ritzen Group, Inc. v. Jackson Masonry, LLC (In re Jackson Masonry, LLC),1 the Sixth Circuit reviewed circuit authority on finality of orders for appellate purposes and affirmed the district court's dismissal of an appeal from an order denying stay relief. The Court of Appeals said that, under 28...
Critical Case Comment
Print This Article
Link to Post:
By Kevin R. Anderson, Chapter 13 Trustee for the District of Utah
Alvarez v. HSBC Bank USA (In re Alvarez), 733 F.3d 136, (4th Cir. Oct. 23, 2013).
When spouses own real property as tenants by the entirety, the bankruptcy filing of one spouse does not sever the unity of the tenancy, and the interest of the non-filing spouse does not become property of the estate. Therefore, the bankruptcy court is without jurisdiction to modify a lienholder’s rights as to the non-debtor’s interest in the real property.
Case Summary . . .
It looks like you are not signed in or registered! This content is only available to members.
Or Sign In Below:
Related Articles
From the Editor
Supreme Court Agrees to Revisit Finality of Orders in Bankruptcy
Chapter 13 Trustee Duties, Powers, And Limitations – Part 3
The Hanging Paragraph – Hanging on Every Word Part 4 of 4
ABI Commission on Consumer Bankruptcy – Collateral Repossessed Pre-Petition
Leading a Winning Team
Ms. Ps & Qs
Here’s How a Name Change Affects a Tax Return
An Update on Student Debt Relief and What this Means for Chapter 13 Practitioners
Acquisition of Post-Confirmation Property in Chapter 13: What Remains of the Estate?