The NACTT Academy offers a comprehensive community for bankruptcy professionals seeking to advance their education in consumer bankruptcy.
ConsiderChapter13.org offers a forum to advance continuing education of consumer bankruptcy via access to insightful articles, informative webinars, and the latest industry news. Join now to benefit from expert resources and stay informed.
These informative sessions are led by industry experts and cover a range of consumer bankruptcy topics.
Written by industry experts, these articles provide in-depth analysis and practical guidance on consumer bankruptcy topics.
The Academy is the go-to source for the latest news and analysis in the Chapter 13 bankruptcy industry.
Critical Case Comment
Print This Article
Link to Post:
By Kevin R. Anderson, Chapter 13 Trustee for the District of Utah
Alvarez v. HSBC Bank USA (In re Alvarez), 733 F.3d 136, (4th Cir. Oct. 23, 2013).
When spouses own real property as tenants by the entirety, the bankruptcy filing of one spouse does not sever the unity of the tenancy, and the interest of the non-filing spouse does not become property of the estate. Therefore, the bankruptcy court is without jurisdiction to modify a lienholder’s rights as to the non-debtor’s interest in the real property.
Case Summary . . .
It looks like you are not signed in or registered! This content is only available to members.
Or Sign In Below:
Related Articles
Lenders Can’t Hide from Consequences of Misapplication of Mortgage Payments
Creditors’ Rights and Debtors’ Protections at the Intersection of Consumer Bankruptcy and UCC Article 9 – Part 3
Critical Case Comment – $67k Windfall to Debtors. Fraudulent??
Choice of Staying in Chapter 13 or Converting to 7? Circuits Show It Makes a Difference
From the Archives – An Oldie but Goodie
Critical Case Comment – Relief from Stay, Check; But Better Act Fast
How to Manage Incompetent, Unprepared, and Unreasonable Creditor Bankruptcy Counsel
2 Million ITINs Set to Expire in 2019; To Avoid Refund Delays Apply Soon
From the Editor
Are Direct Payments by Debtor on Mortgage Considered Payments “Under the Plan” for Purposes of Discharge?