By William H. Brown, Adviser to The Academy d/b/a ConsiderChapter13.org In the most recent opinion on the issue, as of this writing, the Court in In re Rivera, 2019 WL 1430273 (Bankr. D. Ariz. Mar. 28, 2019), in perhaps still a minority view, concluded that debtors’ default in making all direct postpetition mortgage payments was not a failure to complete...
Critical Case Comment
Print This Article
Link to Post:
By Kevin R. Anderson, Chapter 13 Trustee for the District of Utah
Alvarez v. HSBC Bank USA (In re Alvarez), 733 F.3d 136, (4th Cir. Oct. 23, 2013).
When spouses own real property as tenants by the entirety, the bankruptcy filing of one spouse does not sever the unity of the tenancy, and the interest of the non-filing spouse does not become property of the estate. Therefore, the bankruptcy court is without jurisdiction to modify a lienholder’s rights as to the non-debtor’s interest in the real property.
Case Summary . . .
It looks like you are not signed in or registered! This content is only available to members.
Or sign in below:
Related Articles
Thoughts on Zealous Advocacy – Addendum: “Zeal” Case Summaries – Behavior – Part 5
Employers Who Provide Leave Might Qualify to Claim Valuable Credit
Getting Over the Finish Line: Not So Fast
Are Direct Payments by Debtor on Mortgage Considered Payments “Under the Plan” for Purposes of Discharge?
Amendments to Federal Rule of Bankruptcy Procedure 3002.1
A Few of Our Favorite (Chapter 13) Things
What Constitutes Property of the Estate in Chapter 13, and What are the Consequences of Failing to Amend the Schedules?
The Day the Music Died
Federal Rule of Bankruptcy Procedure 2002: Who Gives Notice?
The Hardest-Won Skill of a Bankruptcy Attorney