By Mark C. Leffler, Boleman Law Firm, PC (Richmond, Hampton, and Va. Beach, VA) Part I: Derby v. Portfolio Recovery Associates Recently, Hon. Keith L. Phillips of the Eastern District of Virginia Bankruptcy Court issued his fourth and final written opinion in the Derby v. Portfolio Recovery Associates adversary proceeding, Adv. Pro. No. 18-03097-KLP, 2020 Bankr. LEXIS 2589 (Bankr. E.D.Va....
From the Editor’s Desk – Conversion and Dismissal
Print This Article
Link to Post:
By The Honorable William Houston Brown (Retired)
Debtor did not have absolute right to dismiss. After the largest unsecured creditor, the debtor’s ex-wife, moved to convert Chapter 13 case, the debtor did not have absolute right to voluntarily dismiss; there was evidence of bad faith, and the debtor’s only motive for filing case was to avoid state court orders in marital dissolution and contempt proceedings. Conversion to Chapter 7 was in the best interests of creditors. The court discussed the split of authority on whether the debtor has the absolute right to dismiss . . .
It looks like you are not signed in or registered! This content is only available to members.
Or sign in below:
Related Articles
I Win. I Win. Trustee Holds Record for Having the Oldest Open Chapter 13 Case
“How Long, O Lord?”
Recent Trends in the Interpretation of Midland v. Johnson and the Applicability of the FDCPA to Bankruptcy Cases
The Student Loan Solution
Getting Paid for All Your Work Even Post Discharge
Critical Case Comment–“No Realistic Future Prospects”
Bartenwerfer: Willful and Malicious Injuries?
4 Reasons to Keep Time Records No One Discusses
Passing of Memphis’ Beloved Judge Kennedy
Chapter 13 Trustees Prosecutorial Discretion