By Lawrence R. Ahern III, Brown & Ahern (Nashville, TN) Introduction In Ritzen Group, Inc. v. Jackson Masonry, LLC (In re Jackson Masonry, LLC),1 the Sixth Circuit reviewed circuit authority on finality of orders for appellate purposes and affirmed the district court's dismissal of an appeal from an order denying stay relief. The Court of Appeals said that, under 28...
Critical Case Comment
Print This Article
Link to Post:
By Kevin R. Anderson, Chapter 13 Trustee for the District of Utah
In re Stain, Slip Copy, 2013 WL 5217800 (Bankr. D. Utah, Sept. 16, 2013) (Hon. William T. Thurman).
The court will not modify a plan nunc pro tunc to retroactively eliminate plan payments so as to effect a permanent forgiveness of a debtor’s delinquency. However, upon a showing of good cause, and after notice and a hearing, the court can prospectively modify a plan to cure the delinquency while at the same time lowering a debtor’s plan payment.
It looks like you are not signed in or registered! This content is only available to members.
Or sign in below:
Related Articles
Passing of Chief Judge – Central District of California
Kellner Retires
Volunteering is Great But Not If You Expected Payment
7th Circuit Supports Attorneys’ Fees Paid from Disposable Income
No Constitutional Right to a Fresh Start
In re Fulton: Seventh Circuit Affirms Its Position with Majority of Circuits on Passive Retention of Property as Violation of Sections 362 and 542
Supreme Court Agrees to Revisit Finality of Orders in Bankruptcy
WE LOVE AND WILL MISS YOU, HELEN
House Judiciary Committee Hearing
ABI Commission on Consumer Bankruptcy – Dischargeability of Homeowner Association Fees