The NACTT Academy offers a comprehensive community for bankruptcy professionals seeking to advance their education in consumer bankruptcy.
ConsiderChapter13.org offers a forum to advance continuing education of consumer bankruptcy via access to insightful articles, informative webinars, and the latest industry news. Join now to benefit from expert resources and stay informed.
These informative sessions are led by industry experts and cover a range of consumer bankruptcy topics.
Written by industry experts, these articles provide in-depth analysis and practical guidance on consumer bankruptcy topics.
The Academy is the go-to source for the latest news and analysis in the Chapter 13 bankruptcy industry.
Applicable Commitment Period
Print This Article
Link to Post:
By The Honorable William Houston Brown (Retired)
(Judge Brown prepares quarterly updates of consumer law developments for the Federal Judicial Center, which circulates the updates to bankruptcy judges.)
Applicable commitment period applies to debtors with no projected disposable income. The Ninth Circuit, en banc, overruled one aspect of Maney v. Kagenveama (In re Kagenveama), 541 F.3d 868 (9th Cir. 2008), holding that § 1325(b)(1)(B) requires for confirmation that the length of the plan must be at least equal to § 1325(b)(4)’s applicable commitment period. Even . . .
It looks like you are not signed in or registered! This content is only available to members.
Or Sign In Below:
Related Articles
Planning for Attorney Disability or Death
From 5 Divisions to 4 Grandchildren, 3+ pets, 2 Hobbies and 1 Private Practice: The “Retirement” of Robert Wilson
Critical Case Comment – No POC, No Money
6 Steps to Ethical Unbundling of Bankruptcy Representation
Are Your Loyalties Divided?
Well, I Thought We Were Surrendering the Vehicle
Chapter 13 Trustee Duties, Powers, And Limitations – Part 5
Critical Case Comment – Sec. 328 vs. Sec. 327 Not Exactly a Smack Down
2022 Bankruptcy Procedure Year in Review: Revised Statute and Rules and Selected Cases Part 9 More from the Supreme Court: MOAC Mall Holdings LLC v. Transform Holdco LLC
Taekwondo Takedown: Chapter 7 Dismissed Over Discretionary Spending