Ask Ms. Ps & Qs

By Professor Nancy Rapoport

Dear Readers:

We are happy to have a member’s question to answer this month:

Dear Ms. Ps and Qs:

An attorney moves to withdraw as counsel because of a client’s threatened malpractice action, intending to leave the debtor pro se to defend a pending motion to dismiss with prejudice (to bar him from refiling for 180 days). Is it likely that the court will grant the motion to withdraw?

Signed,

It looks like you are not signed in or registered! This content is only available to members.

Or Sign In Below:

No Author Biography has been linked to this Article.

Ninth Circuit BAP Says§ 523(a)(15) Includes §§ 523(a)(2), (4) and (6) in Chapter 7

M. Jonathan Hayes

January 28, 2024

Does § 523(a)(15) include claims by a spouse against the other spouse for fraud etc, i.e., §§ 523(a)(2), (4) and (6), in a chapter 7 case?

Members

CFPB Settles with Student CU Connect CUSO Over ITT Private Loan Program

June 16, 2019

On 6/14/19, the CFPB (Bureau) announced a settlement with Student CU Connect CUSO, LLC (CUSO), a company set up to hold and manage private loans for students at ITT Technical Institute. The Bureau filed a complaint and a proposed stipulated judgment in federal district court for the Southern District of Indiana alleging that CUSO provided substantial assistance to ITT Educational...

Critical Case Comment

June 27, 2021

By Henry E. Hildebrand, III, Chapter 13 Standing Trustee (Nashville, TN) It constitutes an unfair discrimination, violative of 11 U.S.C. § 1322(b)(1), for a Chapter 13 plan which would pay more to a student loan than to the remaining general unsecured creditors. (Somers) In re Kane, 603 B.R. 491 (Bankr. C.D. Kan. June 18, 2019) Case Summary Ronald Kane filed...

Members

The NCBJ Is Turning 100

The Honorable Deborah L. Thorne, The Honorable Kathy A. Surratt-States

April 21, 2024

Judge Deborah Thorne, NDIL, and Judge Kathy Surratt-States, EDMO, on behalf of the NCBJ’s DEI Committee, have written two articles about some of judicial firsts.

Escrow 101 – Part 1 of 3

August 29, 2021

By Michael J. McCormick, Esq., McCalla Raymer Leibert Pierce, LLC (Roswell, GA) Escrow 101 – Part 2 Escrow 101 – Part 3 Escrow 102 – Part 1 Escrow 102 – Part 2

Members

Chapter 13 Trustee Duties, Powers, And Limitations – Part 6

November 8, 2020

By James J. Robinson, Chief United States Bankruptcy Judge, Northern District of Alabama When do the trustee’s duties end, and who gets the money? Harris v. Viegelahn, 135 S. Ct. 1829 (2015). This opinion of the unanimous Court requires the trustee to return to the debtor undistributed plan payments—originating from wages earned postpetition—on hand at a good-faith, post-confirmation conversion rather...

Members

Duty to Update Trustee Regarding Changes Post-Plan Confirmation

Daryl J. Smith

April 23, 2023

Is there a duty to inform the trustee about changes post-plan confirmation? Yes. There is an inherent duty for the consumer debtor to update the trustee on any and all material changes, particularly windfalls, post plan confirmation. In a very recent case, In Re Robinson, the United States Trustee moved to dismiss debtor’s chapter 13 case because the debtor received...

Members

Appointment of Deb Miller

The Academy

April 2, 2023

It is our distinct honor to inform you that Acting U.S. Trustee Paul Randolph has selected Debra L. Miller as the next Standing Chapter 13 Trustee for the Eastern District of Tennessee (Northern and Northeastern Divisions). Ms. Miller has served as a Standing Chapter 13 Trustee in the Northern District of Indiana since 2000. Her wealth of experience will allow...

Critical Case Comment – What About a Zero Value Junior Lien?

Henry E. Hildebrand, III

November 5, 2023

Bankruptcy Court has authority to compel implementation of a confirmed Chapter 13 plan which, at its end required the release of a junior lien which had been given no value; attorney’s fees would be awarded to debtors’ counsel for pursuing the release.

Members

Deconstructing the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act: Obduskey Says Lawyers Conducting Nonjudicial Foreclosure Are Not “Debt Collectors”

April 7, 2019

By Lawrence R. Ahern III, Brown & Ahern (Nashville, TN) Introduction On March 20, 2019, the Supreme Court ruled unanimously in Obduskey v. McCarthy & Holthus LLP1 that actions required by state law in a nonjudicial foreclosure are not regulated by the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act (FDCPA).2 The decision resolved a split in the circuits. In addition to the...

Members

Ask Ms. Ps & Qs

Link to Post:

Or Sign In Below:

Related Articles

Ninth Circuit BAP Says§ 523(a)(15) Includes §§ 523(a)(2), (4) and (6) in Chapter 7

CFPB Settles with Student CU Connect CUSO Over ITT Private Loan Program

Critical Case Comment

The NCBJ Is Turning 100

Escrow 101 – Part 1 of 3

Chapter 13 Trustee Duties, Powers, And Limitations – Part 6

Duty to Update Trustee Regarding Changes Post-Plan Confirmation

Appointment of Deb Miller

Critical Case Comment – What About a Zero Value Junior Lien?

Deconstructing the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act: Obduskey Says Lawyers Conducting Nonjudicial Foreclosure Are Not “Debt Collectors”

Academy

Members

Website

Legal

Looking to Become a Member?

Webinars

Member Articles

Industry News

To get started, please let us know which of these best fits your current position: