Hann v. Educational Credit Mgmt. Corp. (In re Hann), No. NH 11-084, 2012 WL 3195135, at *2, *10–*11 (B.A.P. 1st Cir. Aug. 7, 2012) (Hillman, Feeney, Hoffman)

Disallowance of claim of ECMC with finding that $0 was due is preclusive of collection of any student loan debt after discharge notwithstanding that dischargeability was not at issue during claim objection hearing. ECMC filed a proof of claim for $55,000. The debtor objected. ECMC neither responded to the claim objection nor attended the evidentiary hearing. Debtor put on evidence that the student loans had been paid in full before the petition. The bankruptcy court order sustained the debtor’s objection and stated “‘[t]his [c]ourt allows the claim of ECMC in the amount of $0.00.’” After completion of payments and discharge, ECMC took collection action and debtor sought contempt. “The issue is not whether a nondischargeable debt can be discharged by virtue of its disallowance, but whether there is a debt at all where the claim has been disallowed on the grounds of pre-petition payment in full. By definition, where there is no claim, there is no debt and nothing is discharged. . . . [B]y filing the Claim Objection, Hann invoked the appropriate procedural mechanism provided by the Bankruptcy Code to obtain a determination of both the validity and amount of the Claim. . . . [T]he bankruptcy court conducted a thorough review . . . . This process yielded a ruling that the amount of the Claim on the date of Hann’s bankruptcy petition was zero. . . . The court having concluded that there is no extant claim, there can be no liability on a claim and hence no debt . . . . [T]he [order sustaining the claim objection] which is the subject of this appeal effectively precluded any further attempt by ECMC to collect on the alleged student loan debt.”

No Author Biography has been linked to this Article.

Related Articles

December 22, 2019
By Lawrence R. Ahern, III, Brown & Ahern (Nashville, TN) Part VII Introduction This series focuses on four bankruptcy-related bills that were enacted during the 116th Congress and signed into law on August 23, 2019. One bill, the Small Business Reorganization Act of 2019 (SBRA), will be effective February 19, 2020. It appears in its entirety in Appendix B to...
September 25, 2022
Sahni v. Tajima (In re Tajima) 2022 WL 3354006 (9th Cir. BAP Aug 15, 2022)(unpublished) S.Klein J ISSUE Did the Bankruptcy Court err when confirming Chapter 13 plan? RULING Yes. FACTS This case involves the tension of litigation in bankruptcy causing delay, and the need to get a Chapter 13 plan confirmed quickly. Here, there was a dispute between debtors...
August 6, 2023
Practice Point: Just because it is an unsecured claim does not mean that it should be ignored. Review all claims for inappropriate violations and disclosure of personal identifiers! Keep track of serial violators for possible use in future requests for contempt and sanctions. With all of the emphasis these days on transparency and the requirement for more and more information...
December 13, 2020
By Hon. William Houston Brown, Adviser, Academy for Consumer Bankruptcy Education and Margaret A. Burks, Chapter 13 Trustee (Cincinnati, OH) Senator Elizabeth Warren (D. Mass.) and House Judiciary Committee Chairman Jerrold Nadler (D. N.Y.) have introduced the Consumer Bankruptcy Reform Act of 2020. Introduction of the Act is only the beginning of the legislative process, and no action toward enactment...
April 23, 2023
In recent years, a handful of cases have discussed the issue of what happens to the trustee’s percentage fee, collected from debtor plan payments, upon the dismissal or conversion of a case prior to confirmation. This is an emerging area of law, with decisions on both sides.  However, with this new issue, there appears to be at least some confusion...
August 9, 2020
By Lawrence R. Ahern III, Brown & Ahern (Nashville, TN) Introduction to this Series Current pandemic circumstances and economic conditions portend an onslaught of bankruptcy filings. In the consumer bankruptcy field, trustees and debtors' counsel often are uncomfortable with the rules in UCC Article 9. Here, we look at a couple of topics that touch on the interplay of Article...
August 30, 2020
By Wayne Silver, Wayne Silver Law (Redwood City, CA) The 120-day CARES Act eviction moratorium expired on Saturday, July 25. At the expiration of the moratorium, landlords covered by the federal moratorium could begin serving eviction notices, and begin filing eviction lawsuits 30 days thereafter. That means on Monday, August 24, 2020 the moratorium on evictions expired, while we face...
July 31, 2022
It started as a means test question: could emergency medical expenses be deemed non consumer debt. It ended up as a step back to get the bigger picture. Well seasoned bankruptcy counsel brought the fact pattern to a list serve of colleagues. The prospective debtors’ income in a small consulting corporation is declining, his health crisis raises not only income...
October 3, 2021
Jack N. Zaharopoulos was appointed as the Chapter 13 Standing Trustee for the Middle District of Pennsylvania on May 1, 2021. He succeeded Charles DeHart after his retirement. After graduating from Marquette Law School in Milwaukee in 2002, Zaharopoulos worked at a general practice firm, doing debtor and creditor bankruptcy work, family law, and even some criminal cases. After gaining...
October 16, 2022
The facts in In re DeWitt, 2022 WL 4588320 (Bankr. S.D. Ohio 2022), are a bit “unusual”. Debtor filed Chapter 13 to reinstate her mortgage. The mortgage was “non-escrowed” and Debtor was required to pay property taxes directly. Surprisingly, she did not pay her property taxes. The first time, the Lender paid the property taxes but decided not to pursue...