In re Hernandez, No. 11-21090, 2012 WL 1067692, at *2–*3 (Bankr. D. Wyo. Mar. 23, 2012) (McNiff)

Applicable commitment period is determined as of effective date of the plan; stepchildren resulting from remarriage after petition but before confirmation are included in household size for § 1325(b)(3) purposes. At the petition, debtor claimed household size of three. Subsequent to petition, debtor remarried and new spouse brought two stepchildren to live with debtor. Debtor amended Form B22C, asserting household size of five. “This court finds the analysis of the Bankruptcy Code in [In re Anderson, 367 B.R. 727 (Bankr. D. Kan. Apr. 13, 2007) (Berger),] persuasive. The clear language of the statute reflects that upon the trustee’s objection of [sic] a plan under § 1325(b)(1), the Debtor’s applicable commitment period is determined, upon the effective date of the plan or its confirmation. . . . ‘In the “dependant” approach, the debtor must have reasons to provide support for a dependant and the claimed dependant must have a reason to rely on the debtor.’ . . . [T]he Debtor meets the standards to claim his spouse and stepchildren as dependents for the purpose of determining household size. The spouse and children have been living with the Debtor for one[ ]year; the parties have married; the children are minors; the spouse does not have an independent income source . . . ; both children and the Debtor’s spouse will be claimed as an IRS deduction in their joint return for 2011.”

No Author Biography has been linked to this Article.

Related Articles

NN Photo
March 20, 2022
A New Jersey attorney is the subject of a legal malpractice complaint for allegedly failing to properly preserve a marital tort claim as an exception to discharge. Asma J. Warsi v. Adrian J. Johnson (Case No. MID-L-001023-22, Super. Ct. of N.J., Middlesex County); In re Chaundry, 569 B.R. 372 (Bankr. D. N.J. 2017). In Chaundry, Creditor Wife had a marital...
Members
Copy of Hildebrand-2016
June 26, 2022
Even though the Model Plan in the district provides that the applicable commitment period starts from confirmation, the debtor may not apply pre-confirmation payments toward payments made during the applicable commitment period but must apply those payments in addition to the applicable commitment period payments. (Applebaum) In re Batoha, 2022 WL 1310943 (Bankr. E.D. Mich. May 2, 2022) Case Summary...
Members
May 31, 2020
By The Honorable William Houston Brown (Retired) Application of Taggart to lien avoidance. When the Chapter 13 confirmed plan bifurcated the secured creditor’s claim and the secured portion had been paid in full with interest, the completion of payments voided any lien, and the creditor violated the discharge injunction by commencing foreclosure. The Panel found the plan’s language, although “inartful,”...
Members
William-1_print_2019
On June 6, the Supreme Court’s unanimous opinion in Siegel v. Fitzgerald1 held that the increase in U.S. Trustee fees in Chapter 11 cases violated the uniformity requirement of the Constitution’s Bankruptcy Clause,2 because the fee increase in 2017 only applied to in the U.S. Trustee districts and didn’t apply to the Bankruptcy Administrator districts in Alabama and North Carolina....
ahern_larry_regular
May 15, 2022
Background - In re Taggart In 2019, the Supreme Court rendered its opinion in In re Taggart,1 which was the subject of earlier analyses: (1) Is a Finding of Contempt Precluded by a "Good Faith" but Unreasonable Belief that an Action Does Not Violate the Discharge Injunction?; (2) Looking Beyond . . . It looks like you are not signed...
Members
September 25, 2022
Just prior to a confirmation docket in September of 2006, a local creditor attorney asked me if I would be interested in coming to work at his firm. The chapter 13 trustee was in the room and could not help but overhear. After the docket that trustee asked me if I was looking for a job. I wasn’t . ....
moran_cathy
April 3, 2022
True. Most people no longer itemize under the current Tax Code. However, the amount of money involved varies and should be considered. The same very important debts that a Chapter 13 plan pays are often tax deductible. And your client is still the person who’s paying, even if the trustee writes the check. Don’t allow them to miss out on...
Members
May 5, 2019
By Henry E. Hildebrand, III, Chapter 13 Standing Trustee (Nashville, TN) Section I. Student Loans, Part II – Suggested Regulatory and Judicial Changes In our last installment of the Academy Report on the ABI Commission on Consumer Bankruptcy we dealt with the ABI Commission’s suggested statutory modifications which could address some of the problems facing borrowers confronted with substantial student...
Members
February 3, 2019
As people prepare to file their taxes, there are things to consider. They will want to determine if they need to file and the best way to do so. For tax year 2018, all individual taxpayers will file using the new Form 1040. Forms 1040A and 1040EZ are no longer available. Taxpayers who previously filed these forms will now file...