Thomas v. Federal Nat’l Mortg. Ass’n (In re Thomas), 469 B.R. 915, 923 (B.A.P. 10th Cir. 2012) (Thurman, Nugent, Romero)

Order confirming that stay had expired pursuant to § 362(c)(3) and (j) is reversed and remanded for bankruptcy court to determine whether Federal National Mortgage Association had standing to seek order that no stay was in effect under § 362(j); bankruptcy court did not examine or accept into evidence note endorsed in blank from which Fannie Mae’s “‘colorable claim’” could be determined. “Appellee must prove that it has a ‘colorable claim’ to an ownership interest in the Property or, in other words, ‘a facially valid security interest,’ in order to establish its standing to seek a § 362(j) comfort order. Proof of the existence of a colorable claim in this case necessarily requires Appellee to prove that it has a ‘facially valid security interest’ under Oklahoma law.”

No Author Biography has been linked to this Article.

Related Articles

balboa
August 20, 2023
Wishing our dear friend and colleague, Isabel Balboa, a hearty congratulations on her upcoming retirement. As many of you know, Isabel came to the United States from Cuba at the age of 6 with her mother and sisters.  Upon leaving Cuba, they were forced to leave everything behind for fear that they would be caught and detained.  Her father was...
KIMBALL
January 9, 2022
(Used with permission. First published in the Southern District of Florida Courthouse Beacon, December 2021) Imagine this is an article entitled Wiley Champion, Esq. Instructs How To Win Your Case Every Time. Enticing for sure. You start reading. The opening paragraph needlessly re-states the title, needlessly names the author, who is already mentioned in the title, and then defines the...
Members
September 27, 2020
By Professor Nancy Rapoport Dear Readers: The Academy staff has raised an important issue: Given the mental health issues associated with the pandemic, what should someone do when he or she sees a colleague lawyer in distress? Before we get to the ethics implications, let’s talk about the mental health issue itself. When people are under great stress, they try...
Members
July 7, 2019
By Henry E. Hildebrand, III, Chapter 13 Standing Trustee for the Middle District of Tennessee (Nashville) Where a confirmation order of a debtor’s Chapter 12 plan specifically provided for payments to a creditor and the Chapter 12 trustee had supported confirmation of the plan, the trustee would be precluded from seeking to disallow a late-filed claim. Following the plan, the...
Members
June 27, 2021
By M. Jonathan Hayes, Resnik Hayes Moradi LLP (Los Angeles, CA) (Reprinted with permission. Originally published by the Los Angeles Daily Journal on May 20, 2021) We have been getting a lot of calls recently as you might expect from distressed small businesses. The “free” government money is starting to run out and panic is setting in. The potential client...
Members
image002
June 30, 2024
The NACTT's Inclusion and Acceptance Committee promotes Chapter 13 Trustee internships through the Tom Vaughn Memorial Internship Program, providing significant benefits to interns.
Copy of Hildebrand-2016
January 14, 2024
In some instances, this case could be a real game-changer for dealing with student loans. Chapter 13 plan may classify student loans in a separate class!
Members
Dynele Schinker-Kuharich
July 14, 2024
“Attending the NACTT Annual Seminar provided the opportunity to catch up with Chapter 13 colleagues from around the country who are quickly becoming good friends; and to build relationships with colleagues who have recently joined our niche’ of the bankruptcy field.”
ahern_larry_regular
December 4, 2022
Introduction This series reviews developments in bankruptcy procedure during 2022. Amendments to 16 rules and new one new rule take effect December 1, 2022, absent Congressional action. Many reflect changes necessitated by the Small Business Reorganization Act of 2019 (SBRA),1 and have been in place in the same or similar form on an interim basis since that legislation took effect.
Members
moran_cathy
August 20, 2023
What are the consequences of a secured lender’s failure to comply with R. 3002.1 in a prior case when the debtor files again? Significant, it seems. . . . since their attorney said he “didn’t see the need” to do so. [Can you guess, now, how this comes out?]
Members

Looking to Become a Member?

ConsiderChapter13.org offers a forum to advance continuing education of consumer bankruptcy via access to insightful articles, informative webinars, and the latest industry news. Join now to benefit from expert resources and stay informed.

Webinars

These informative sessions are led by industry experts and cover a range of consumer bankruptcy topics.

Member Articles

Written by industry experts, these articles provide in-depth analysis and practical guidance on consumer bankruptcy topics.

Industry News

The Academy is the go-to source for the latest news and analysis in the Chapter 13 bankruptcy industry.

To get started, please let us know which of these best fits your current position: