The NACTT Academy offers a comprehensive community for bankruptcy professionals seeking to advance their education in consumer bankruptcy.
ConsiderChapter13.org offers a forum to advance continuing education of consumer bankruptcy via access to insightful articles, informative webinars, and the latest industry news. Join now to benefit from expert resources and stay informed.
These informative sessions are led by industry experts and cover a range of consumer bankruptcy topics.
Written by industry experts, these articles provide in-depth analysis and practical guidance on consumer bankruptcy topics.
The Academy is the go-to source for the latest news and analysis in the Chapter 13 bankruptcy industry.
Critical Case Comment
Print This Article
Link to Post:
By Henry E. Hildebrand, III, Chapter 13 Trustee for the Middle District of TN
Danielson v. Flores (In re Flores), 2012 WL 3803936 (9th Cir, Aug. 31, 2013) (Chen)
Debtors with no “projected disposable income” as calculated on Form 22C do not have a mandatory applicable commitment period and can propose Chapter 13 plans less than 60 months, even after Lanning.
Case Summary
The Flores’ had income above the median for their state and filed a Chapter 13 petition proposing a plan of 36 months with monthly payments of $148. The proposed plan would . . .
It looks like you are not signed in or registered! This content is only available to members.
Or Sign In Below:
Related Articles
Judicial Year in Review 2021: Part 3 – Selected Cases under Parts IV-VII of the Federal Rules of Bankruptcy Procedure
Is Nunc Pro Tunc Really Sunk?
From the Editor
Creditors’ Rights and Debtors’ Protections at the Intersection of Consumer Bankruptcy and UCC Article 9
A Day in the Life of a Chapter 13 Trustee
Critical Case Comment – Service Counts
The Hunt for Deductible Interest – Money Too Often Left on the Table
All Taxpayers Should Plan Ahead for Natural Disasters
Character Counts
What IS a Principal Residence?