Yet Another Pre-Discharge Requirement in Chapter 13 – the Section 1328 Certificate

By Jonathan Ginsberg, Atlanta Bankruptcy Attorney

The Bankruptcy Code’s requirement that debtors obtain and file both a pre-filing credit counseling certificate and a post filing financial management course certificate have been rightly criticized as ineffective, time consuming and an unnecessary financial burden on people who do not have a lot of extra money.

In my Atlanta area Chapter 13 practice in particular the sentiment I hear expressed most is one of confusion.  The two months between filing and confirmation are filled with phone calls, document production, amendments, payments to the trustee and anxiety waiting to hear if the trustee will withdraw his objections to confirmation.  Once their cases are confirmed, my clients often have little enthusiasm to spend another $50 and another two to three hours attending a financial management course.

Now, there is an additional pre-discharge requirement in the Northern District of Georgia that adds yet another administrative burden on debtors – the Section 1328 certificate.

This certificate, which must be signed by the debtor and filed by counsel, asserts under penalty of perjury that the debtor is or is not current with all domestic obligations – child support and/or alimony, and that the debtor has or has not received a discharge in a prior bankruptcy case that would make him ineligible for a discharge in this case.

If you are a Chapter 13 debtor and you do not fill out and submit this form, you will not get your Chapter 13 discharge.

In my view, this 1328 certificate obligation is yet another unnecessary and time wasting requirement that unnecessarily increases the cost and complexity of personal bankruptcy.  The statement regarding prior discharges is duplicative of the assertion that every debtor makes when he files his case – previous cases filed within the 8 years are already disclosed.  Now, before discharge, we want debtors to promise again that they are eligible for discharge?

As far as the promises regarding child support and alimony – the Code already makes these debts non-dischargeable and it appears to me that denying a delinquent non-custodial parent the opportunity to get rid of other debts would make it less likely rather than more likely that child support payments will be made.

It seems that this requirement like so many others in the Code are intended to address issues unrelated to the core issue in bankruptcy – can this person pay his debt or not?  Bloating the Code with public policy concerns not related to economics just adds complexity and cost to a system that is already too complicated.

What do you think?  Should Congress use the Bankruptcy Code to further policy goals unrelated to a debtor’s capacity to pay back debt?

Jonathan GinsbergJonathan Ginsberg – has represented Chapter 7 and Chapter 13 debtors in the Atlanta area for over 20 years.  A graduate of Tulane University College of Law, Jonathan regularly teaches continuing legal education classes for Georgia lawyers about consumer bankruptcy and Social Security disability.  He is also a faculty member at Solo Practice University, an on-line law practice development resource for attorneys entering private law practice.  Jonathan has published the Atlanta bankruptcy blog since 2005 and is a founding member of the Bankruptcy Law Network.

No Author Biography has been linked to this Article.

Related Articles

June 5, 2022
Bankruptcy has been the focus of the Boleman Law Firm’s 30+ year history, but my law partners and I believed it was important for our firm’s long-term health to add a new practice area that would be complimentary to bankruptcy. Even though we were filing almost 250 new Chapter 7 and 13 cases every month before the pandemic, most of...
October 27, 2019
By Lawrence R. Ahern, III, Brown & Ahern (Nashville, TN) Part IV Two More Things Trustees Should Know About the Small Business Reorganization Act of 2019 Introduction Four bankruptcy-related bills were enacted during the 116th Congress and signed into law on August 23, 2019.1 The legislation affected both business and consumer cases. One bill, the Small Business Reorganization Act of...
June 26, 2022
Consumers have burned through their stimulus cash and are now drawing down their savings to satisfy pent up spending sprees and to cover the increasing cost of living. This cannot continue. From 2015 through the end of 2019, consumers held a consistent average of $1.1 trillion in savings. However, with the commencement of the COVID pandemic and the first of...
April 18, 2021
By Herbert L. Beskin, Chapter 13 Standing Trustee for the Western District of Virginia (Charlottesville) If you’re looking for a well-written and clear appellate opinion about a much-litigated topic, with a bit of ancient mythology thrown in for good measure, this HUD’s for you. The case is Wood v. U.S. Dept. of Housing & Urban Development (In re Larry and...
Copy of Hildebrand-2016
January 16, 2022
While a 13 trustee is partially insulated by the Barton doctrine from being dragged into state court, if a movant seeks authority from the Bankruptcy Court to pursue the trustee and satisfies the conditions of the Barton doctrine, the trustee may be subject to state court judicial proceedings. (Hall) In re Alexander Louis Bednar, 2021 WL 1625399 (Bankr. W.D. Okla....
July 31, 2022
It started as a means test question: could emergency medical expenses be deemed non consumer debt. It ended up as a step back to get the bigger picture. Well seasoned bankruptcy counsel brought the fact pattern to a list serve of colleagues. The prospective debtors’ income in a small consulting corporation is declining, his health crisis raises not only income...
August 18, 2019
Taxpayers with expiring individual taxpayer identification numbers should renew their number ASAP. There are nearly 2 million ITINs set to expire at the end of 2019. Taxpayers with an expiring number should renew before the end of this year. This will help avoid unnecessary delays related to their tax refunds next year. ITINs are used by taxpayers required to file...
January 6, 2019
By John P. Gustafson, United States Bankruptcy Judge, Northern District of Ohio, Western Division (Toledo, OH) Click here for Part 1 of 6 Click here for Part 3 of 6 Click here for Part 4 of 6 Click here for Part 5 of 6 Click here for Part 6 . . . It looks like you are not signed in...
March 14, 2021
By The Honorable William Houston Brown (Retired) Failure to pay postpetition fees under Rule 3002.1 did not prevent discharge. The debtor had completed payments to the trustee and postpetition mortgage payments to the creditor, but she had not paid $1,370 in postpetition fees that had been asserted by the mortgage creditor and noticed to the debtor under Rule 3002.1. That...
Copy of Hildebrand-2016
March 19, 2023
Below-median Chapter 13 debtor bears the burden of justifying a plan longer than three years as confirmation of a five-year plan would be denied as providing insufficient justification to exceed three years. (Robinson) In re Ingram, 2023 WL 2529730 (Bankr. N.D. Ala. March 15, 2023) Case Summary Danny Ingram filed four bankruptcy cases over 20 years. He was single with...

Looking to Become a Member? offers a forum to advance continuing education of consumer bankruptcy via access to insightful articles, informative webinars, and the latest industry news. Join now to benefit from expert resources and stay informed.


These informative sessions are led by industry experts and cover a range of consumer bankruptcy topics.

Member Articles

Written by industry experts, these articles provide in-depth analysis and practical guidance on consumer bankruptcy topics.

Industry News

The Academy is the go-to source for the latest news and analysis in the Chapter 13 bankruptcy industry.

To get started, please let us know which of these best fits your current position: