The NACTT Academy offers a comprehensive community for bankruptcy professionals seeking to advance their education in consumer bankruptcy.
ConsiderChapter13.org offers a forum to advance continuing education of consumer bankruptcy via access to insightful articles, informative webinars, and the latest industry news. Join now to benefit from expert resources and stay informed.
These informative sessions are led by industry experts and cover a range of consumer bankruptcy topics.
Written by industry experts, these articles provide in-depth analysis and practical guidance on consumer bankruptcy topics.
The Academy is the go-to source for the latest news and analysis in the Chapter 13 bankruptcy industry.
Critical Case Comment: Morris v. Quigley
Print This Article
Link to Post:
By Henry E. Hildebrand, III, Chapter 13 Trustee for the Middle District of TN
Morris v. Quigley, 2012 WL 718894 (4th Cir, March 7, 2012) (Traxler)
In calculating an above-median income Chapter 13 debtor’s projected disposable income, a debtor should not be permitted to deduct payments for the secured debts which collateral the debtor proposes to surrender.
Case Summary
Susan Quigley filed a Chapter 13 petition and listed ownership of two all-terrain vehicles and a 2004 Ford truck. In calculating her projected disposable income, she deducted the monthly payments on the secured debts . . .
It looks like you are not signed in or registered! This content is only available to members.
Or Sign In Below:
Related Articles
Critical Case Comment – How Much Is It Worth – Then/Now?
Today’s AI Stands to Create Work for Lawyers
Personal Injury Attorney’s Duty of Reasonable Inquiry of a Client’s Bankruptcy
Critical Case Comment – Pre-Confirmation Payments
Report of the American Bankruptcy Institute’s Commission on Consumer Bankruptcy
What, Exactly, Is the Trustee’s Percentage Fee
Lenders Can’t Hide from Consequences of Misapplication of Mortgage Payments
Critical Case Comment – Service Counts
Congress, It’s Time to Get Rid of That Stupid Means Test
Critical Case Comment – Watch for Opportunities to Bifurcate Home Mortgage Claims