Critical Case Comment: Morris v. Quigley

By Henry E. Hildebrand, III, Chapter 13 Trustee for the Middle District of TN

Morris v. Quigley, 2012 WL 718894 (4th Cir, March 7, 2012) (Traxler)

In calculating an above-median income Chapter 13 debtor’s projected disposable income, a debtor should not be permitted to deduct payments for the secured debts which collateral the debtor proposes to surrender.

Case Summary

Susan Quigley filed a Chapter 13 petition and listed ownership of two all-terrain vehicles and a 2004 Ford truck. In calculating her projected disposable income, she deducted the monthly payments on the secured debts . . .

It looks like you are not signed in or registered! This content is only available to members.

Or Sign In Below:

No Author Biography has been linked to this Article.

Justice Sotomayor’s Direction in Fulton Becomes Reality in Amended FRBP 7000(1)(A)

Karen D. Visser

April 6, 2025

After Fulton cast doubt on how Chapter 13 debtors could recover vehicles repossessed before filing, a 2024 amendment to Rule 7001 clarified the issue.

Members

Chris Hawkins Appointed Judge

The Academy

March 20, 2022

Chris Hawkins was sworn in as a bankruptcy judge for the Middle District of Alabama on March 14, 2022, succeeding Judge William R. Sawyer. Before his appointment, Chris was a partner at Bradley Arant Boult Cummings LLP, where he focused exclusively on bankruptcy and insolvency matters. For over twenty years, he represented debtors and creditors in out-of-court restructurings, commercial and...

Twenty Years After BAPCPA; The Federal Form Still Doesn’t Follow the Statute

Robert G. Drummond

September 28, 2025

“The calculations in Form B122C-1 are directly at odds with the calculations in § 1325(b)(2)(B).”

Members

The Dollar Dance: Boosting Deductions in Bankruptcy’s Means Test

Cathy Moran

November 24, 2024

“Every extra dollar deduction you can wring out on bankruptcy’s means test is important. A dollar doesn’t sound like a lot, . . . Every $100 saves $6000. Get the picture?”

Members

In the Trenches: Secrets to Settlement – Competency in the Courtroom Part 3 of 3

June 23, 2019

By Jan Hamilton, Chapter 13 Trustee (Topeka, KS) Click here for Part 1 of 3 Click here for Part 2 of 3 19. In the Courtroom ― Leading Questions Learning how to conduct a direct examination of your witnesses is the cornerstone to your case. Early . . . It looks like you are not signed in or registered! This...

Members

Director Removed

The Academy

March 16, 2025

Trump's Justice Department Shakeup Hits Bankruptcy Watchdog Making the Bankruptcy System Less Great

The Gambling Debtor – What is a Chapter 13 Trustee to Do?

Stacey A. O’Stafy

January 28, 2024

Gambling was one of the earliest forms of entertainment, likely pre-dating recorded human history and before man invented minted currency. . . . gambling alone is not evidence of bad faith! Another article on this topic: If You’re Gonna Bet the Farm, Maybe Play Against the House

Members

From the Editor – Debtor’s Attorney

May 17, 2020

By The Honorable William Houston Brown (Retired) No attorney fees for Chapter 7 work in converted case. In a case that began as Chapter 7 and converted to Chapter 13, the debtor’s attorney sought fees for work in the Chapter 7 phase under § 330(a)(4)(B) rather than § 330(a)(1). The Court found the better interpretation of § 330(a)(4)(B)’s language “in...

Members

A Sappy Farewell to Jeff Kellner as the Dayton Chapter 13 Trustee

September 29, 2019

By The Honorable Guy R. Humphrey, Southern District of Ohio It is with heavy hearts that we in Dayton, Ohio say our farewells to Jeff Kellner as our Chapter 13 Trustee. Jeff will be concluding his duties as the Trustee on September 30th and handing the reins over to John Jansing on October 1st. Listing Jeff’s contributions to the bankruptcy...

Critical Case Comment – No Such Thing as “Technical” Violation of the Stay

Henry E. Hildebrand, III

February 20, 2022

Bankruptcy Court found violation of automatic stay to be “technical”, thus no damages. Ninth Circuit BAP did not agree. Continuing to pursue state court fraudulent transfer action after transfer or filed for Chapter 7 relief violated the automatic stay; even if the violation of the stay is “technical”, damages, including attorneys’ fees and costs, should be assessed against the violator....

Members