Critical Case Comment:In re Pena

By Henry E. Hildebrand, III, Chapter 13 Trustee for the Middle District of Tennessee

In re Pena, 456 B.R. 451 (Bankr. E.D. Ca., Sept. 9, 2011) (Lee)

A secured creditor in a Chapter 13 case is not automatically entitled to recover unclaimed payments it was owed under a Chapter 13 plan by simply establishing its status as holder of the original proof of claim.

Case Summary

The Debtors’ Chapter 13 plan proposed to maintain payments and cure a default on a mortgage owed to BAC Home Loans Servicing (later Bank of America). Bank of . . .

It looks like you are not signed in or registered! This content is only available to members.

Or Sign In Below:

No Author Biography has been linked to this Article.

Ask Ms. Ps & Qs

Nancy B. Rapoport

June 25, 2023

Dear Readers: By now, I’m hoping that all of you are aware of the sad story of the plaintiff’s lawyers in Mata v. Avianca, Inc., Case No. 22-cv-1461 (PKC) (S.D.N.Y). Lawyer A used ChatGPT to “research” a brief; Lawyer A was not admitted in the jurisdiction, so Lawyer B (same firm) entered a notice of appearance; Lawyer B filed Lawyer...

Members

Ditch the Bankruptcy Jargon—Marketing Chapter 13 as the UltimateSolution

Jen Lee

January 5, 2025

“If you want to connect with more clients, you must stop talking about bankruptcy as though it exists in isolation. Instead, compare it head-on with the alternatives.” New author to ConsiderChapter13.org, Jen Lee will be bringing readers a series, primarily, on law firm management and marketing.

Members

Lessons From In Re Chase: Student Loan Discharge and Loan Consolidation

Rahaf Alrehaili, Esq.

January 5, 2025

A recent decision out of Maine underscores the strategic nuances of discharging student loans in bankruptcy.

Members

The Hanging Paragraph – Hanging on Every Word Part 4 of 4

July 5, 2020

By Anthony J. Gomez, CPA, former extern to the Honorable John P. Gustafson, Northern District of Ohio at Toledo V. The Good Faith Requirement The hanging paragraph was enacted to protect creditors. It accomplishes this by prohibiting the bifurcation of certain secured debts that were acquired shortly before the time of filing. Despite a Chapter 13 debtor’s inability to bifurcate...

Members

Why Your Bankruptcy Client Doesn’t Understand You (And How to Fix the Problem)

Cathy Moran

October 20, 2024

Bankruptcy terminology, so familiar to lawyers, stymies clients. Even common English words seem to flummox our clients. We are a pair, divided by our common language. Check out Attorney Moran’s Words at War and then add your own to be shared next week.

Members

Generative A.I. – Be Afraid, Be Very Afraid

Naliko Markel

October 22, 2023

“ . . . next leap: Generative A.I. learns everything there is to know about you from your public social media presence and crafts phishing attacks unique to YOU.”

Members

Big Dog Bites Back but Too Late

Henry E. Hildebrand, III

January 12, 2025

An alleged lessor’s tardy objection to confirmation of a Chapter 13 plan which treats the obligation as a secured loan is precluded from pursuing that objection after passage of the deadline established by the court.

Members

Hot Off the Press

The Academy

July 21, 2024

Selection of Kyu Young (Mike) Paek to Serve as Bankruptcy Judge in the Southern District of New York. See also: ABI 40 Under 40

Re-Examining the Means Test Cost of Home Ownership

Cathy Moran

December 29, 2024

From June: Bankruptcy lawyers can better present non-mortgage homeownership expenses to reflect current economic realities on the means test. By advocating for realistic expense allowances, based on a percentage of the home’s purchase price, attorneys can ensure fairer assessments and more successful bankruptcy plans. Additionally, Trustees and Judges should look at Atty Moran’s analysis here – change will take the whole village.

Members

Deconstructing the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act: Obduskey Says Lawyers Conducting Nonjudicial Foreclosure Are Not “Debt Collectors”

April 7, 2019

By Lawrence R. Ahern III, Brown & Ahern (Nashville, TN) Introduction On March 20, 2019, the Supreme Court ruled unanimously in Obduskey v. McCarthy & Holthus LLP1 that actions required by state law in a nonjudicial foreclosure are not regulated by the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act (FDCPA).2 The decision resolved a split in the circuits. In addition to the...

Members