Critical Case Comment:In re Pena

By Henry E. Hildebrand, III, Chapter 13 Trustee for the Middle District of Tennessee

In re Pena, 456 B.R. 451 (Bankr. E.D. Ca., Sept. 9, 2011) (Lee)

A secured creditor in a Chapter 13 case is not automatically entitled to recover unclaimed payments it was owed under a Chapter 13 plan by simply establishing its status as holder of the original proof of claim.

Case Summary

The Debtors’ Chapter 13 plan proposed to maintain payments and cure a default on a mortgage owed to BAC Home Loans Servicing (later Bank of America). Bank of . . .

It looks like you are not signed in or registered! This content is only available to members.

Or Sign In Below:

No Author Biography has been linked to this Article.

Ordinary Heroes Deliver Second Chances with Bankruptcy

July 28, 2019

By Robert (Bob) Schuman, Owner/Managing Broker, Network Financial Group I’m a mortgage broker. In that role, I see close up the immense relief that a homeowner feels when they file Chapter 13. They are no longer forced to deal with collection calls and a multitude of letters that are aggressive and intimidating, threatening to take their car, foreclose on their...

Consumer Bankruptcy Reform Act of 2020 Introduced

December 13, 2020

By Hon. William Houston Brown, Adviser, Academy for Consumer Bankruptcy Education and Margaret A. Burks, Chapter 13 Trustee (Cincinnati, OH) Senator Elizabeth Warren (D. Mass.) and House Judiciary Committee Chairman Jerrold Nadler (D. N.Y.) have introduced the Consumer Bankruptcy Reform Act of 2020. Introduction of the Act is only the beginning of the legislative process, and no action toward enactment...

Saldana v. Bronitsky – Point of View

Cathy Moran

December 1, 2024

Stay tuned as next week we will bring you the Counter-Point to Moran’s POV.

Members

Private Collection Agencies – What You and Debtors Need to Know

November 17, 2019

Taxpayers who are contacted by a private collection agency on behalf of the IRS might have questions about the program. These taxpayers can visit IRS.gov to find answers to questions they might have. In fact, to better help these taxpayers, the IRS recently updated the private debt collection pages on IRS.gov. These updates added more information for taxpayers whose case...

Some Basics You Always Wanted to Know About the FCRA But Were Too Embarrassed to Ask

October 20, 2019

By Herb Beskin, Chapter 13 Trustee and Edward M. Wayland, Esq. (Charlottesville, VA) Trustees are not privy to the struggles of Debtors as they emerge from Chapter 13 and work to re-establish (establish?) their credit worthiness. A crucial factor in this process is the Debtor’s credit report. In this article, we discuss the Fair Credit Reporting Act (“FCRA”), the rules...

Members

The Effect of “Success” (or the Lack of It) on Attorneys’ Fees – Part 1: Judicial and Legislative Background

Lawrence R. Ahern, III

September 18, 2022

Introduction In In re Village Apothecary, Inc.,1 the Sixth Circuit last month reduced an attorney's fees by half, where the professional's services were not "successful." The results obtained (or, actually, the lack of results) justified cutting the fees of attorneys for a Chapter 7 trustee by 50%. Why It Matters to Chapter 13 People This analysis of the implications of...

Members

New Judge Appointed

The Academy

September 8, 2024

Judges of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 9th Circuit have appointed J. Barrett Marum as the next bankruptcy judge on the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Southern District of California.

Post-Confirmation Modification Can Cut Commitment Period

Henry E. Hildebrand, III

September 21, 2025

Chapter 13 debtor may modify confirmed plan, both to reduce payments and shorten length of plan even though the debtor had above-median income at the time of confirmation but below median income, at the time of modification.

Members

The Long Reach of R. 3002.1

Cathy Moran

August 20, 2023

What are the consequences of a secured lender’s failure to comply with R. 3002.1 in a prior case when the debtor files again? Significant, it seems. . . . since their attorney said he “didn’t see the need” to do so. [Can you guess, now, how this comes out?]

Members

From NCBJ – Bartenwerfer v. Buckley and Coerced Debt

Edward C. Boltz

June 8, 2025

See also: Unjust Enrichment from Spouse’s Defalcation Leads to a Nondischargeable Debt Unjust Enrichment: Where Are We Headed?