The NACTT Academy offers a comprehensive community for bankruptcy professionals seeking to advance their education in consumer bankruptcy.
ConsiderChapter13.org offers a forum to advance continuing education of consumer bankruptcy via access to insightful articles, informative webinars, and the latest industry news. Join now to benefit from expert resources and stay informed.
These informative sessions are led by industry experts and cover a range of consumer bankruptcy topics.
Written by industry experts, these articles provide in-depth analysis and practical guidance on consumer bankruptcy topics.
The Academy is the go-to source for the latest news and analysis in the Chapter 13 bankruptcy industry.
Critical Case Comment: In re Munoz
Print This Article
Link to Post:
By Henry E. Hildebrand, III, Chapter 13 Trustee for the Middle District of Tennessee
In re Munoz, 459 B.R. 621 (Bankr. S.D. Tex., June 21, 2011) (Schmidt)
A creditor that asserted a secured claim in a Chapter 13 case which was subsequently dismissed is estopped from asserting that its claim was an executory contract in a subsequent Chapter 13 case.
Case Summary
The Debtors’ first Chapter 13 plan proposed to treat the claim of MHR as a secured claim. MHR filed a proof of claim as a secured creditor and the plan . . .
It looks like you are not signed in or registered! This content is only available to members.
Or Sign In Below:
Related Articles
The Hanging Paragraph – Hanging on Every Word Part 4 of 4
Looking Beyond Taggart: Is the Contempt Standard for a Stay Violation the Same as for a Discharge Injunction Violation?
Critical Case Comment
The Means Test Income
Creditors’ Rights and Debtors’ Protections at the Intersection of Consumer Bankruptcy and UCC Article 9
Fourth Circuit Examines Tenancy by Entirety
The NCBJ Is Turning 100
How To Manage Incompetent, Unprepared, and Negligent Bankruptcy Counsel
Critical Case Comment
Spoofing and the Legal Profession: No One is Immune