The NACTT Academy offers a comprehensive community for bankruptcy professionals seeking to advance their education in consumer bankruptcy.
ConsiderChapter13.org offers a forum to advance continuing education of consumer bankruptcy via access to insightful articles, informative webinars, and the latest industry news. Join now to benefit from expert resources and stay informed.
These informative sessions are led by industry experts and cover a range of consumer bankruptcy topics.
Written by industry experts, these articles provide in-depth analysis and practical guidance on consumer bankruptcy topics.
The Academy is the go-to source for the latest news and analysis in the Chapter 13 bankruptcy industry.
Critical Case Comment: In re Munoz
Print This Article
Link to Post:
By Henry E. Hildebrand, III, Chapter 13 Trustee for the Middle District of Tennessee
In re Munoz, 459 B.R. 621 (Bankr. S.D. Tex., June 21, 2011) (Schmidt)
A creditor that asserted a secured claim in a Chapter 13 case which was subsequently dismissed is estopped from asserting that its claim was an executory contract in a subsequent Chapter 13 case.
Case Summary
The Debtors’ first Chapter 13 plan proposed to treat the claim of MHR as a secured claim. MHR filed a proof of claim as a secured creditor and the plan . . .
It looks like you are not signed in or registered! This content is only available to members.
Or Sign In Below:
Related Articles
Between the 1st and the 15th: Is Mortgage Current?
Two Supreme Court Decisions with Effects on Bankruptcy Practice
Paid in Full, But Title in Limbo
Here’s How a Name Change Affects a Tax Return
How to Present an Effective Summary Judgment Motion
From the Editor – Dismissal
An Open Thank You Letter to NACTT – Reflections from a New(er) Trustee: My First Two Years
Interns: Musings of a Chapter 13 Trustee
Too Bad So Sad for 76-Year-Old Who Failed Brunner Test
Proactive Client Communication Strategy: Flood the Zone