ConsiderChapter13.org offers a forum to advance continuing education of consumer bankruptcy via access to insightful articles, informative webinars, and the latest industry news. Join now to benefit from expert resources and stay informed.
These informative sessions are led by industry experts and cover a range of consumer bankruptcy topics.
Written by industry experts, these articles provide in-depth analysis and practical guidance on consumer bankruptcy topics.
The Academy is the go-to source for the latest news and analysis in the Chapter 13 bankruptcy industry.
Critical Case Comment: In re Munoz
Print This Article
Link to Post:
By Henry E. Hildebrand, III, Chapter 13 Trustee for the Middle District of Tennessee
In re Munoz, 459 B.R. 621 (Bankr. S.D. Tex., June 21, 2011) (Schmidt)
A creditor that asserted a secured claim in a Chapter 13 case which was subsequently dismissed is estopped from asserting that its claim was an executory contract in a subsequent Chapter 13 case.
Case Summary
The Debtors’ first Chapter 13 plan proposed to treat the claim of MHR as a secured claim. MHR filed a proof of claim as a secured creditor and the plan . . .
It looks like you are not signed in or registered! This content is only available to members.
Or sign in below:
Related Articles
Holiday Memories
Critical Case Comment – Creditor Not Required to Dismiss Prepetition Nonbankruptcy Action
Critical Case Comment – Although a Mess, Month-to-Month Lease Assumed
Critical Case Comment – Prime vs. Riskless Treasury Rate
Disability and Distress: The Effect of Disability Programs on Financial Outcomes – A Study
Recent Cases Navigate Retirement Account Exemptions
Accruing Interest: Date of Filing vs. Confirmation
Paid in Full, But Title in Limbo
2nd Circuit Joins Bandwagon
Deconstructing the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act: Obduskey Says Lawyers Conducting Nonjudicial Foreclosure Are Not “Debt Collectors”