General Rules in Creating Fee Applications (With a Side-Dish of How to Act as Local Counsel)

By Nancy Rapoport, Gordon Silver Professor at the William S. Boyd School of Law, University of Nevada, Las Vegas (a/k/a Ms. Ps & Qs)

  • Be really, really clear about what you’re doing as you report your time. Don’t just say “review pleadings”–say “review pleadings filed on X day,” so that the court can tell what you actually read without having to go back through the docket and guess. Don’t just say “review and respond to emails”–say “review and respond to emails from unsecured creditors about X.” Break down your prep time from your travel time (often, travel time is billed at half-rate) from your time in court, because most courts won’t let you block bill more than .5 hours a day. (And you should bill your time in .1 increments.)
  • If you are acting as local counsel, it is totally OK (and appropriate) for you to read everything that the national firm wants you to file. It’s your bar card that’s at stake when you file something. Ask the national firm to give you as much lead time as possible so that you have time to make sure you’re comfortable with what you’re supposed to file.
  • Watch those expenses, and warn national counsel that what may play well in some other jurisdictions might not play well in yours. E.g., I’ve seen some non-atty professionals think that staying at fancy hotels and having wine w/dinner are OK to bill the estate. And in one of the cases I reviewed, an attorney BILLED A SHIRT to the estate. (He kept the shirt.) Not the best idea for him (and the time he spent deposing me on why I had objected to that part of his bill wasn’t his finest hour, either).
  • If the court allows appearance by phone and you don’t plan to have a speaking role in a particular hearing, go ahead and appear by phone if that will save fees and expenses. (Don’t forget that your phone operates as a live mike, though. We’ve all seen the faces that people make when they hear food being eaten during a hearing.)
  • Get familiar with the local rules about fees–most courts have some sort of local rule linking to the U.S. Trustee Guidelines or a jazz riff of those guidelines. Pay attention to what’s ok and what’s not–especially in terms of things like overtime (usually non-compensable).
  • Allocate the tasks to the lowest reasonable biller. Partners making copies of documents will trigger lots of questions. Partners doing quick research may not. If an assistant can do something, don’t have an associate do it. If a paralegal can do something, don’t have an associate do it. But if something needs a particular level of experience, give the task to the right person.
  • Try to persuade your partners and the national firms that billing summer associate time is not a good idea. The standard is “benefit to the estate.” I was a summer associate once. I wasn’t much use to anyone then. Many clients outside bankruptcy won’t pay for summer associate time (or, for that matter, for some junior associate time); therefore, many bankruptcy courts will look askance at you billing your summer associates’ work product to the estate.
  • Watch those hourly rate increases. Even if your firm (or the national firm) raises rates each January, that doesn’t mean that the increased rates will reflect an increased benefit to the estate in YOUR case–especially if, say, you start work in December and raise your rates in January.
  • My personal favorite–don’t bill what something “should have” cost if you had drafted it from scratch. If you only swapped out names and some pertinent facts, that should take much less time than would drafting from scratch. I once saw an 8-page stay relief motion that had a 34-hour billable time record attached to it. If there’s a reason that something that looked simple to draft actually took a disproportionate amount of time, you might want to explain why (as a preemptive move) in your application.
  • If you write off time before you submit your fee application, go ahead and tell the court what you wrote off and why. Demonstrating good billing judgment throughout will build up an unofficial presumption of reasonableness in your later bills.
  • If a fee examiner asks you questions, often the examiner will be satisfied by reasonable answers. Don’t assume that the fee examiner wants to cut your bill to the bone. He or she just wants to be able to provide the court with sufficient information that the court can rule on the reasonableness of your fees.

Nancy B. Rapoport, a/k/a “Ms. Ps & Qs,” is the Gordon Silver Professor at the William S. Boyd School of Law, University of Nevada, Las Vegas. Professor Rapoport’s prior experience includes private practice, primarily in bankruptcy law, in San Francisco, and a distinguished academic career at multiple academic institutions, including serving as Associate Dean and Professor at The Ohio State University College of Law and Dean and Professor at both the University of Nebraska College of Law and University of Houston Law Center. Her specialties are bankruptcy ethics, ethics in governance, and the depiction of lawyers in popular culture.

She has also appeared in the Academy Award®-nominated movie, Enron: The Smartest Guys in the Room (Magnolia Pictures 2005) (as herself). Although the movie garnered her a listing in www.imdb.com, she still hasn’t been able to join the Screen Actors Guild. When not acting, teaching or writing, in her spare time, she competes, pro-am, in American Rhythm, American Smooth, and 9-Dance ballroom dancing with her teacher, Sergei Shapoval. You can visit her blog at: http://nancyrapoport.blogspot.com.


No Author Biography has been linked to this Article.

Related Articles

emily-connor-kennedy
March 6, 2022
There are several different types of security clearances that an individual might seek as a prerequisite to employment. What each clearance requires depends on many factors, such as whether the person is a civilian or part of the armed forces, whether the clearance is for facility access only (versus access to sensitive documents), and the scope of the access in...
Members
bridgingrelationships
Chapter 13 Trustees occupy unique positions.  Every day they work with the courts, clerks’ offices, debtors, creditors, and their attorneys, and the Office of the United States Trustees.  Within ethical bounds, it is important that Chapter 13 trustees build and maintain relationships with each of these constituents.  Civility, professionalism, and trust are the mainstays for all of these interactions. We...
Members
Mark
October 15, 2023
“Why do I need the FDCPA if there’s already a remedy under Rule 3001?” This is what the bankruptcy judge asked me when I brought an adversary proceeding against a claims buyer, alleging potential class claims under both the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act (“FDCPA”) and Bankruptcy Rule 3001(c)(2). The defendant had a business practice of filing high volumes of...
Members
April 18, 2021
By Lawrence R. Ahern, III, Brown & Ahern (Nashville, TN) Introduction Analyzing the new "COVID-19 discharge" provision added to Chapter 131 by Congress on December 27 as part of the coronavirus emergency response legislation, the Bankruptcy Court for the Central District of California decided in In re Ritter2 that, in order to receive such a discharge, debtors must still comply...
Members
Copy of Hildebrand-2016
Chapter 13 debtor has no obligation to voluntarily disclose changes in income or the acquisition of post-petition assets absent a request from a party in interest for such information.  (Kendig) In re Poe, 2022 WL 3639415, (Bankr. N.D. Ohio August 22, 2022) Case Summary Mr. Poe filed a Chapter 13 petition in March of 2019.  At the time of filing,...
Members
moran_cathy
February 25, 2024
“The headline was ‘Are your clients really stupid?’ . . .The answer isn’t what you’re tempted to respond.” The second in a 3-part series on treating clients as we would want to be treated. More on this topic: Why Listening Is a Bankruptcy Lawyer’s Superpower
Members
June 21, 2020
By The Honorable William Houston Brown (Retired) Objection to proof of claim barred by preclusion. The Chapter 13 debtor objected to Wells Fargo’s proof of claim in an adversary proceeding that alleged the note had been procured by fraud and was unenforceable; but the debtor had previously litigated those and other issues in the state court. Preclusive effect of the...
Members
NalikoMarkel-150x150
October 22, 2023
“ . . . next leap: Generative A.I. learns everything there is to know about you from your public social media presence and crafts phishing attacks unique to YOU.”
Members
June 27, 2021
By M. Jonathan Hayes, Resnik Hayes Moradi LLP (Los Angeles, CA) (Reprinted with permission. Originally published by the Los Angeles Daily Journal on May 20, 2021) We have been getting a lot of calls recently as you might expect from distressed small businesses. The “free” government money is starting to run out and panic is setting in. The potential client...
Members
November 15, 2020
Lawrence R. Ahern, III Brown & Ahern Nashville, Tennessee Appendix B Adjustments to Means Test Amounts (Cases Filed On or After November 1, 2020) The tables on the following page provide median family income adjustments reproduced in a format designed for ease of use in completing Bankruptcy Forms 122A-1 and 122C-1. STATE 1 EARNER FAMILY SIZE 2 PEOPLE 3 PEOPLE...
Members

Looking to Become a Member?

ConsiderChapter13.org offers a forum to advance continuing education of consumer bankruptcy via access to insightful articles, informative webinars, and the latest industry news. Join now to benefit from expert resources and stay informed.

Webinars

These informative sessions are led by industry experts and cover a range of consumer bankruptcy topics.

Member Articles

Written by industry experts, these articles provide in-depth analysis and practical guidance on consumer bankruptcy topics.

Industry News

The Academy is the go-to source for the latest news and analysis in the Chapter 13 bankruptcy industry.

To get started, please let us know which of these best fits your current position: