The NACTT Academy offers a comprehensive community for bankruptcy professionals seeking to advance their education in consumer bankruptcy.
ConsiderChapter13.org offers a forum to advance continuing education of consumer bankruptcy via access to insightful articles, informative webinars, and the latest industry news. Join now to benefit from expert resources and stay informed.
These informative sessions are led by industry experts and cover a range of consumer bankruptcy topics.
Written by industry experts, these articles provide in-depth analysis and practical guidance on consumer bankruptcy topics.
The Academy is the go-to source for the latest news and analysis in the Chapter 13 bankruptcy industry.
CRITICAL CASE COMMENT: In re Hicks
Print This Article
Link to Post:
In re Hicks, 2011 WL 2414419 (Bankr. N.D. Ala. June 15, 2011) (Robinson)
A Chapter 13 plan proposing to pay claims secured by property that is not reasonable or necessary will not be confirmed as the plan lacks requisite good faith, even where the debtors satisfy the technical requirements of the disposable income test.
Case Summary
The Debtors proposed a Chapter 13 plan which would pay to the Trustee $1,000 per month for 60 months, paying ten cents on the dollar to unsecured creditors. The Trustee objected to confirmation of the plan . . .
It looks like you are not signed in or registered! This content is only available to members.
Or Sign In Below:
Related Articles
From the Editor – Dismissal
Lawyers are People Too: An Interview with Jenny Doling
The Dangers of Extending a Plan Too Long – Or Alternatively, Why Take as Little Time as Possible
What the FICO? Reaffirming Doesn’t Help My Credit Score?
Critical Case Comment – Hell Hath No Fury, Until It Meets the S.D. of PA
Retirement of the Honorable Guy R. Humphrey
From the Supreme Court
A Few of Our Favorite (Chapter 13) Things
Two More Things Trustees Should Know About the Small Business Reorganization Act of 2019
Annulment of the Automatic Stay: A Concept Whose Time Has Come – And Gone