By Nancy B. Rapoport, Garman Turner Gordon Professor of Law, Boyd School of Law, and Affiliate Professor of Business Law & Ethics, Lee Business School, William S. Boyd School of Law, University of Nevada, Las Vegas Dear Readers: My guardian angel, Regina Logsdon has asked a great question:what should you do when your “Spidey sense” tells you that your client...
CRITICAL CASE COMMENT: In re Elibo
Print This Article
Link to Post:
CRITICAL CASE COMMENT
In re Elibo, 447 B.R. 359 (Bankr. S.D. Fla., March 15, 2011) (Kimball)
A Chapter 13 plan may both modify a secured creditor’s claim by “cramming down” the value of the collateral and by extending the remaining payments beyond the plan term pursuant to § 1322(b)(5).
Case Summary
Mr. Elibo owned real estate in West Palm Beach, Florida that was not his principal residence. The property was subject to a first mortgage with a balance of approximately $200,000. The property was valued . . .
It looks like you are not signed in or registered! This content is only available to members.
Or Sign In Below:
Related Articles
Ms. Ps & Qs
The Proposed Consumer Bankruptcy Reform Act: A Political Analysis
From the Editor – Dismissal
Do I Really Have to Tell the Trustee About Newly Acquired Assets?
Small Business Chapter 11 Update, Where Are We Eight Months In?
Substantial Contribution Claims
Critical Case Comment
From the Editor – Discharge Injunction
SBRA – The Sequel: Leases in Bankruptcy Under the Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2021
From the Editor – Discharge