Ms. Ps & Qs’s Ethics Dilemma of the Month

-

Link to Post:

Dear Ms. Ps and Qs:

This month, we have three related issues to discuss, all of which involve issues of disclosure:

(1) On Facebook or other social media, can a trustee “friend” a debtor represented by counsel and use that social media to look for assets or other information?

(2) Do I really, really need to have actual signatures on documents that I’m e-filing?

(3) If I’m just helping out a friend by serving as an appearance attorney, do I need to do all of the folderol of filing a Rule 2016 . . .

It looks like you are not signed in or registered! This content is only available to members.

Or Sign In Below:

No Author Biography has been linked to this Article.

Related Articles

Meet A Newish Trustee

July 28, 2019
Tiffany M. Cornejo was appointed as the Chapter 13 Standing Trustee for the District of New Mexico on December 1, 2017. She took the reins from retiring Kelley Skehen. Ms. Cornejo received her Bachelor of Science in Journalism (B.S.J.) degree at the University of Kansas in Lawrence in 2002 and remained there to obtain her Juris Doctor in 2005. She...
View Article
ACH-headshot

Preferences: When does the Clock Start Running?

February 19, 2023
Creditors may now be subject to more preference actions, especially for those cases filed in Indiana. The Seventh Circuit recently overturned long-standing precedent that the preference period on garnishment of attachment would no longer run from the date of service or knowledge of the attachment but when the funds were paid over. The Seventh Circuit Court of Appeals in Mark...
View Article
Members
Copy of Hildebrand-2016

Critical Case Comment – But It’s a GOLF CART!

November 20, 2022
A golf cart is a motor vehicle and may be exempted by a Chapter 7 debtor under state law. (Loyd) In re Smith, 2022 WL 3023209 (Bankr. W.D. Okla. July 28, 2022) Case Summary Bobby Smith filed a Chapter 7 petition and listed his golf cart as an exempt asset under Oklahoma law because it was a “motor vehicle.” The...
View Article
Members
Copy of Hildebrand-2016

Critical Case Comment – No Such Thing as “Technical” Violation of the Stay

February 20, 2022
Bankruptcy Court found violation of automatic stay to be “technical”, thus no damages. Ninth Circuit BAP did not agree. Continuing to pursue state court fraudulent transfer action after transfer or filed for Chapter 7 relief violated the automatic stay; even if the violation of the stay is “technical”, damages, including attorneys’ fees and costs, should be assessed against the violator....
View Article
Members
Academy Circle Logo Final

Chapter 13 Trustees Prosecutorial Discretion

July 30, 2023
While administering cases, Chapter 13 Trustees should carefully exercise their prosecutorial discretion. Trustee discretion is a powerful tool. It should be used wisely and consistently.  Trustees should have office policies in place fort heir attorneys and office staff.  What matters involve discretion? The UST Chapter 13 Handbook describes some: We asked the NACTT Emeritus Trustees for their thoughts and examples...
View Article

The Kill Switch and The Stay

July 11, 2021
Kara K. Gendron, Esquire, Mott & Gendron Law (Harrisburg, PA) A “kill switch” is a device which can be used to disable a machine or program. They have been used for years in a myriad of safety measures, such as shutting down machinery in the event of an emergency, or to prevent the theft of a machine or data. Some...
View Article
Members

ABI Commission on Consumer Bankruptcy – Recommendations Related to Exemptions

August 11, 2019
By Henry E. Hildebrand, III, Chapter 13 Standing Trustee (Nashville, TN) Exemptions in consumer cases have always presented difficult problems for practitioners and trustees. In a bow to states’ rights, the Bankruptcy Act of 1898 deferred to exemptions created by state law. When BAPCPA was enacted in 2005, Congress continued the practice of allowing each state to “opt out” of...
View Article
Members

Supreme Court on Statute of Limitations Under Fair Debt Collection Practices Act

December 15, 2019
By William Houston Brown, Editor/Adviser Academy for Consumer Bankruptcy Education Construing the statute of limitations for actions against debt collectors under the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act (FDCA), the Supreme Court held on December 10, 2019, that “absent the application of an equitable doctrine, the statute of limitations in § 1692k(d) begins to run on the date on which the...
View Article
Members
rmichaelsmith

Student Loans Debacle-Part II: Failure to Forgive – The Ticking Time-Bomb

October 23, 2022
The recent push for student loan forgiveness has been met with increasing opposition. The rationales for not providing a generally applicable path for student loan forgiveness or cancellation have included arguments based upon imagined unfairness to those previously able to pay off their loans, which seems to be both short-sighted, as well as a “red herring” argument. It does not...
View Article

From the Editor – Curing Default

October 27, 2019
By The Honorable William Houston Brown (Retired) Debtor could cure default beyond 60 months. Agreeing with In re Klaas, 858 F.3d 820 (3d Cir. 2017), bankruptcy court had discretion to permit debtors to cure plan default, allowing a reasonable grace period beyond the 60 months of confirmed plan. Dismissal of the case for plan default was not required under §...
View Article
Members

The NACTT Academy offers a comprehensive community for bankruptcy professionals seeking to advance their education in consumer bankruptcy.

Academy

Members

Website

Legal

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.