By Hon. Brian Lynch, Bankruptcy Judge, WAWB “[T]he bankruptcy court has a duty to review fee applications, notwithstanding the absence of objections by the United States trustee (“UST”), creditors, or any other interested party….” In re Busy Beaver Bldg. Ctrs., Inc., 19 F.3d 833, 841 (3d Cir. 1994). In Chapter 13 cases this role is critical because in this judge’s...
Critical Case Comment – AmeriCredit Financial Services Inc. v. Penrod (In re Penrod), 2010 WL 2794409 (9th Cir. July 16, 2010) (Mills)
Print This Article
Link to Post:
AmeriCredit Financial Services Inc. v. Penrod (In re Penrod), 2010 WL 2794409 (9th Cir. July 16, 2010) (Mills)
That portion of a secured obligation representing “negative equity” in the purchase of a motor vehicle for a debtor’s personal use within 910 days, is not part of the purchase money security interest and, accordingly, not subject to the protection of the “hanging paragraph.”
Summary of the Case
Marlene Penrod purchased a 2005 Taurus in September 2005. The . . .
It looks like you are not signed in or registered! This content is only available to members.
Or Sign In Below:
Related Articles
Five More Things Debtors Should Know About the SBRA – Part VIII
Postpetition Borrowing by a Consumer Debtor in Chapter 13 – Part 2 of 2
Court Review of Fee Applications in Chapter 13: One Judge’s Perspective
Critical Case Comment – Time is of the Essence
Lawyers are People Too: An Interview with Aki Koyama, Staff Attorney to Chapter 13 Standing Trustee Kathy Dockery
Bankruptcy Courts Grapple with the “COVID-19 Discharge” – Appendix B
Critical Case Comment – Pre to Pre and Post to Post
Critical Case Comment – Stay Violation: Repossession No, Sale Yes
Critical Case Comment – Debtor Refuses to Give Location of Surrendered Mercedes; Pleads the Fifth
Critical Case Comment