The NACTT Academy offers a comprehensive community for bankruptcy professionals seeking to advance their education in consumer bankruptcy.
ConsiderChapter13.org offers a forum to advance continuing education of consumer bankruptcy via access to insightful articles, informative webinars, and the latest industry news. Join now to benefit from expert resources and stay informed.
These informative sessions are led by industry experts and cover a range of consumer bankruptcy topics.
Written by industry experts, these articles provide in-depth analysis and practical guidance on consumer bankruptcy topics.
The Academy is the go-to source for the latest news and analysis in the Chapter 13 bankruptcy industry.
Critical Case Comment – In re Gray, 2009 WL 3849710 (Bankr. D. N.M. November 13, 2009) (Jacobvitz)
Print This Article
Link to Post:
In re Gray, 2009 WL 3849710 (Bankr. D. N.M. November 13, 2009) (Jacobvitz)
Simply because a Chapter 13 debtor, in successive cases, repeatedly failed to comply with the duties imposed on a debtor under the Bankruptcy Code, a court may not prohibit the debtor from refiling.
Summary of the Case
The debtor’s first Chapter 13 petition, filed in February, 2009, was dismissed because the debtor failed to file Schedules, Statement of Financial Affairs, and a . . .
It looks like you are not signed in or registered! This content is only available to members.
Or Sign In Below:
Related Articles
Cyber Security – You Are The Weakest Link
Passing of a Legend
2019 Legislation Affecting Bankruptcy Practice – Part VI
9th Circuit BAP: Actually, Absolute Right to Dismiss Means Absolute
Bankruptcy Courts Grapple with the “COVID-19 Discharge” – Appendix A
Serendipity, a Tribute to Judge Jack B. Schmetterer
Meet a Newish Trustee
Critical Case Comment – You Gotta Fix Your Own Screwups, on Your Own Dime
Looking Beyond Taggart: Is the Contempt Standard for a Stay Violation the Same as for a Discharge Injunction Violation?
What Does the Bankruptcy Code Say About Interest and Unsecured Debts