By Lawrence R. Ahern III, Brown & Ahern (Nashville, TN) Introduction In Ritzen Group, Inc. v. Jackson Masonry, LLC (In re Jackson Masonry, LLC),1 the Sixth Circuit reviewed circuit authority on finality of orders for appellate purposes and affirmed the district court's dismissal of an appeal from an order denying stay relief. The Court of Appeals said that, under 28...
Critical Case Comment – In re Stassi, 2009 WL 3785570 (Bankr. C.D. Ill. Nov. 12, 2009) (Gorman)
Print This Article
Link to Post:
In re Stassi, 2009 WL 3785570 (Bankr. C.D. Ill. Nov. 12, 2009) (Gorman)
A confirmation order which purports to strip off a wholly unsecured junior lien is not binding where the debtor failed to serve the plan pursuant to Rule 7004.
Summary of the Case
The debtors owned a home with a value of $270,000.00. United Community Bank had both a first and a second mortgage on the residence with an aggregate liability of . . .
It looks like you are not signed in or registered! This content is only available to members.
Or Sign In Below:
Related Articles
May the Chapter 13 Trustee Keep Fees Paid Before Dismissal?
Critical Case Comment – You Gotta Tell SOMEBODY!
Supreme Court Agrees to Revisit Finality of Orders in Bankruptcy
Reasonable Fees and/or Questionable Attorney
A Salute to the Consumer Litigation Five Star General
Six Things Taxpayers Should Know About the Sharing Economy and Their Taxes
Critical Case Comment – Sec. 328 vs. Sec. 327 Not Exactly a Smack Down
Objections to Claims: Two of These Creditors Are Not Like the Others [1]
Representing Elderly Clients in Bankruptcy – Part 3 of 3
Critical Case Comment–IRS and the “Innocent Spouse”