ConsiderChapter13.org offers a forum to advance continuing education of consumer bankruptcy via access to insightful articles, informative webinars, and the latest industry news. Join now to benefit from expert resources and stay informed.
These informative sessions are led by industry experts and cover a range of consumer bankruptcy topics.
Written by industry experts, these articles provide in-depth analysis and practical guidance on consumer bankruptcy topics.
The Academy is the go-to source for the latest news and analysis in the Chapter 13 bankruptcy industry.
Critical Case Comment – In re Boyd, 414 B.R. 223 (Bankr. N.D. Ohio August 26, 2009) (Harris)
Print This Article
Link to Post:
In re Boyd, 414 B.R. 223 (Bankr. N.D. Ohio August 26, 2009) (Harris)
Even though a court should apply the “mechanical approach” in determining a debtor’s projected disposable income, adequate tools exist to permit a debtor to be relieved from an unnecessarily high calculation of projected disposable income and a trustee to contest confirmation where a debtor fails to commit what they can afford to pay.
Summary of the Case
The debtor calculated his . . .
It looks like you are not signed in or registered! This content is only available to members.
Or sign in below:
Related Articles
Supreme Court Corner – The Myth of the Bankruptcy Court as a Court of Equity
Saldana v. Bronitsky – POV Counter Point
From the Editor – Claims
Accruing Interest: Date of Filing vs. Confirmation
Small Business Reorganization Act…(“SBRA”) H.R. 3311 – Part Three
Notice vs. Service: Inbox Isn’t the Mailbox
The Guaranty That Got Away from the SBA
Memorial Day 2023
Congress, It’s Time to Get Rid of That Stupid Means Test
Taxes & Timing: Calculating Outcomes for Bankruptcy Debtors