Bankruptcy Courts Grapple with the “COVID-19 Discharge” APPENDIX A 11 U.S.C. § 1328 Discharge (Text added by CAA, effective: December 27, 2020 and subject to one-year sunset, appears in italics.) (Mandatory and precatory directions to the court, critical to the statutory analysis in In re Ritter, appears in bold.) (a) Subject to subsection (d), as soon as practicable after completion...
Critical Case Comment – Thompson v. GMAC, 2009 WL 1457718 (7th Cir. May 27, 2009)
Print This Article
Link to Post:
Thompson v. GMAC, 2009 WL 1457718 (7th Cir. May 27, 2009)
An asset repossessed by a secured creditor pre-petition must be returned to the debtor following the filing of a Chapter 13 petition even in the absence of a showing that the debtor can adequately protect the creditor’s interest in the asset.
Summary of the Case
The debtor purchased a 2003 Chevy Impala financed by GMAC. On January 24, 2008 GMAC repossessed the vehicle and . . .
It looks like you are not signed in or registered! This content is only available to members.
Or sign in below:
Related Articles
Bankruptcy Courts Grapple with the “COVID-19 Discharge” – Appendix A
Lifting the Bar on Discharging Student Loans in Consumer Bankruptcy
Means Test Webinar
Meet the Newest Trustee
What Does “Following” Mean?
Expectations for the 341 Meeting of Creditors
Passing of Sitting Chief Judge
Ask Ms. Ps & Qs
Critical Case Comment – Punitive Damages? Yep.
The Dilemma of Non-Filing Claims