By Cathy Moran, Esq., (Redwood City, CA) Have I got a story for you. A rousing tale of schedules, hearings, frustrations, and ultimately fortunes, traceable to a good story in the fee application. Maybe that's a bit overblown, but I'm telling this story with a purpose. Good stories lead to fair compensation for bankruptcy attorneys. Fee applications aren't hard Filing...
Critical Case Comment – In re Smith, 2009 WL 243396 (Bankr. D. Kan. January 27, 2009)
Print This Article
Link to Post:
In re Smith, 2009 WL 243396 (Bankr. D. Kan. January 27, 2009)
A creditor that fails to timely object to confirmation of a Chapter 13 plan may not invoke Rules 9023 or 9024 to seek relief from the Order Confirming the Plan so long as the creditor received adequate notice of the plan.
Summary of the Case
The debtors filed a Chapter 13 petition on April 16, 2008 and proposed a Chapter 13 plan valuing a mobile . . .
It looks like you are not signed in or registered! This content is only available to members.
Or Sign In Below:
Related Articles
Acquisition of Post-Confirmation Property in Chapter 13: What Remains of the Estate?
Critical Case Comment – Pay the TAXES!
Tell the Story
Taxpayers with Expiring ITINs Should Renew Them Now
Critical Case Comment – $67k Windfall to Debtors. Fraudulent??
How to Manage Unprofessional and Discourteous Attorneys
From the Editor – Discharge Injunction
From the Editor – Dismissal
U.S. Trustee Fee Unconstitutional
Critical Case Comment – It’s All in the Proof