By Henry E. Hildebrand, III, Chapter 13 Standing Trustee (Nashville, TN) A prior servicer of a mortgage claim subsequently transferred to another servicer could be held liable if the transferor servicer provided inadequate or incorrect information to the transferee. (Aron) In re Bivens vs. NewRez LLC (In re Bivens), 625 B.R. 843 (Bankr. M.D. N.C., March 25, 2021) Case Summary...
Critical Case Comment – In re Harrison, 394 B.R. 879 (Bankr. N.D. Ill. 2008)
Print This Article
Link to Post:
In re Harrison, 394 B.R. 879 (Bankr. N.D. Ill. 2008)
A Chapter 13 plan proposed by a debtor not eligible for a discharge may nonetheless pay interest on a “910 claim” calculated at the Till rate but the lien will exist until the full underlying debt is paid.
Summary of the Case
Ray and Rose Harrison received a Chapter 7 discharge in August of 2005. After their discharge, they purchased a 2006 Chevrolet . . .
It looks like you are not signed in or registered! This content is only available to members.
Or Sign In Below:
Related Articles
Notice of Error Regarding Misinformation Given During Phone Call to Mortgage Servicer
Private Collection Agencies – What You and Debtors Need to Know
Critical Case Comment–The Not DSO POC
Critical Case Comment – Pay the TAXES!
Per Capita Bankruptcy Filings Heat Map
Kellner Retires
Judicial Year in Review 2021: Part 4 Selected Cases under Parts VIII and IX of the Federal Rules of Bankruptcy Procedure
Tax Tips for Taxpayers to Consider When Selling Their Home
Judge Carol A. Doyle: Pre-Retirement Interview
Critical Case Comment