The NACTT Academy offers a comprehensive community for bankruptcy professionals seeking to advance their education in consumer bankruptcy.
ConsiderChapter13.org offers a forum to advance continuing education of consumer bankruptcy via access to insightful articles, informative webinars, and the latest industry news. Join now to benefit from expert resources and stay informed.
These informative sessions are led by industry experts and cover a range of consumer bankruptcy topics.
Written by industry experts, these articles provide in-depth analysis and practical guidance on consumer bankruptcy topics.
The Academy is the go-to source for the latest news and analysis in the Chapter 13 bankruptcy industry.
Critical Case Comment – Campbell v. Countrywide Home Loans, Inc., 545 F.3d 348 (5th Cir. 2008)
Print This Article
Link to Post:
Campbell v. Countrywide Home Loans, Inc., 545 F.3d 348 (5th Cir. 2008)
Escrow shortages which accrue prior to the filing of a Chapter 13 petition are part of the pre-petition “cure” claim and their recovery should not be effected by increasing the escrow portion of the ongoing “conduit” payments post-petition.
Summary of the Case
The debtors filed a Chapter 13 petition in April of 2006 seeking to cure a default on their mortgage they . . .
It looks like you are not signed in or registered! This content is only available to members.
Or Sign In Below:
Related Articles
Critical Case Comment – Relief from Stay, Check; But Better Act Fast
Vesting of Property in the Debtor Cuts Off Creditor’s Rights, Ninth Circuit Says
The Bankruptcy Moot Court Experience – Duberstein 2019
The New DOJ/DOE Guidance for Student Loan Bankruptcy Litigation: Promising Early Results
Chapter 13 –Success/Benefits & Everything in between
Judge Carol A. Doyle: Pre-Retirement Interview
2022 Bankruptcy Procedure Year in Review: Revised Statute and Rules and Selected Cases – Part 7 Selected Decisions Under Parts I and II of the Federal Rules of Bankruptcy Procedure
Chapter 13 Trustees Prosecutorial Discretion
Creditors’ Rights and Debtors’ Protections at the Intersection of Consumer Bankruptcy and UCC Article 9
Critical Case Comment