The NACTT Academy offers a comprehensive community for bankruptcy professionals seeking to advance their education in consumer bankruptcy.
ConsiderChapter13.org offers a forum to advance continuing education of consumer bankruptcy via access to insightful articles, informative webinars, and the latest industry news. Join now to benefit from expert resources and stay informed.
These informative sessions are led by industry experts and cover a range of consumer bankruptcy topics.
Written by industry experts, these articles provide in-depth analysis and practical guidance on consumer bankruptcy topics.
The Academy is the go-to source for the latest news and analysis in the Chapter 13 bankruptcy industry.
Critical Case Comment
Print This Article
Link to Post:
by Kevin R. Anderson, Chapter 13 Trustee for the District of Utah
Beaulieu v. Ragos (In re Ragos), --- F.3d ----, 2012 WL 5292949 (C.A.5 (La.)) (Davis).
The Bankruptcy Code excludes Social Security benefits from the calculation of current monthly income, disposable income, and projected disposable income; and it cannot be bad faith to exclude such benefits from the repayment of unsecured creditors through a Chapter 13 plan.
Case Summary
Above-median debtors sought to retain $1,654 per month in Social Security benefits while paying less than 100% to unsecured creditors. The trustee objected . . .
It looks like you are not signed in or registered! This content is only available to members.
Or Sign In Below:
Related Articles
Ask Ms. Ps & Qs
Who Gets the Trustee’s Fee and When?
Eviction Diversion Programs and Chapter 13 Bankruptcy
Meet the New Trustee
Critical Case Comment – How Many Cats?
Why Junk the Whole System When Minor Remedies Would Suffice?
Bankrupt Attorney Cannot Discharge State Court Sanctions
Passing of Memphis’ Beloved Judge Kennedy
Deconstructing the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act: Obduskey Says Lawyers Conducting Nonjudicial Foreclosure Are Not “Debt Collectors”
Why Creditors Should Get Less in Chapter 13