The NACTT Academy offers a comprehensive community for bankruptcy professionals seeking to advance their education in consumer bankruptcy.
ConsiderChapter13.org offers a forum to advance continuing education of consumer bankruptcy via access to insightful articles, informative webinars, and the latest industry news. Join now to benefit from expert resources and stay informed.
These informative sessions are led by industry experts and cover a range of consumer bankruptcy topics.
Written by industry experts, these articles provide in-depth analysis and practical guidance on consumer bankruptcy topics.
The Academy is the go-to source for the latest news and analysis in the Chapter 13 bankruptcy industry.
Tenth Circuit on Woolsey
Print This Article
Link to Post:
By Kevin R. Anderson, Chapter 13 Trustee for the District of Utah
The Tenth Circuit ruled that the lien strip of wholly-unsecured Trust Deed on a debtor’s residence cannot be accomplished through § 506(d) but might be possible under § 1322(b)(2).
The Adversary Proceeding: As part of their Chapter 13 case, the Woolseys filed an adversary proceeding to avoid the second trust deed of Citibank as being wholly-unsecured. However, the complaint also sought an order requiring the bank to forthwith file a Deed of Reconveyance with the county recorder’s office. The bank did not respond . . .
It looks like you are not signed in or registered! This content is only available to members.
Or Sign In Below:
Related Articles
What the FICO? Reaffirming Doesn’t Help My Credit Score?
I Win. I Win. Trustee Holds Record for Having the Oldest Open Chapter 13 Case
Delaware Trustee Michael Joseph to Retire
Certiorai Denied in Evans and Doll
Impact of the Repeal of Cares Act Chapter 13 Plan Modifications: Is It a Death Knell for Cases Beyond 60 Months?
From the Editor
ABI Commission on Consumer Bankruptcy – A Chapter 7 Trustee’s Sale of Encumbered Property
Avoidance Powers In Chapter 13 – Part 2 of 6
Deconstructing the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act: Obduskey Says Lawyers Conducting Nonjudicial Foreclosure Are Not “Debt Collectors”
Critical Case Comment